Sales candidates have a propensity for…expanding the truth. That fact could be stated differently, but let's stick with this wording. Elon Musk has accepted this fact, according to this Entrepreneur article. His approach: …the mogul asks his ...
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

Click here to read this mailing online.

Your email updates, powered by FeedBlitz

 
Here is a sample subscription for you. Click here to start your FREE subscription


| Select Metrix"| Select Metrix" - 5 new articles

  1. Those Lyin’ Candidates
  2. Orientation vs. Onboarding vs. Onramping
  3. Gathering > Giving
  4. Entrepreneurs vs Employees
  5. Bad Hiring Trend-Lack of Decisiveness

Those Lyin’ Candidates

Sales candidates have a propensity for…expanding the truth.  That fact could be stated differently, but let’s stick with this wording.  Elon Musk has accepted this fact, according to this Entrepreneur article.  His approach:

 …the mogul asks his aspirants to tell him one of the most difficult problems they have had to solve or face in their life and how they managed to overcome it.

According to the employer, the people who solved the problem know exactly how they did it and can describe the little details. However, those who lie will not be able to tell their story convincingly.

This approach is effective and revealing.  We use a similar approach in our interviewing activities as we know the details are the key.  A true story has vivid details and specifics (in sales, dollars are key).  One noticeable approach from sales candidates is the tendency to speak in the theoretical.  You will notice the candidate uses few, if any, details.  Instead they speak in generalities, possibilities, and in a passive voice.

When you encounter a candidate in this mode, the best move is to drill down on their responses.  Ask for details, challenge their vagueness and pursue a longer conversation.  This approach will help you get to the truth following Elon Musk’s initial question. 

   
 

Orientation vs. Onboarding vs. Onramping

One of the keys to successful sales leadership is getting newly-hired salespeople up-to-speed quickly.  The time it takes to move them from wide-eyed new hire to qualifying ninja is critical to any company.  High-performing salespeople are the lifeblood of any company.

The way I see it, companies employ one of three processes for launching their new salespeople.

Orientation
This approach falls under the conventional wisdom mode of training new salespeople in the company’s products/services, CRM, expense reports, coffee maker…you get the idea.  The approach is inwardly focused.  The new salesperson, after training, is adept at navigating the internal pitfalls of the company.

Often in this approach, the sales leader provides scant sales training preferring to let the new sales hire figure out what works best for him or her.  New salespeople are expected to show up with a network, pipeline and short sales cycle.  To call this approach outdated is an understatement because it never should have been a sales hire training option in the first place.

Onboarding
This approach is the trendy methodology used by most companies today.  Onboarding is a dramatic leap forward when compared to orientation.  Onboarding involves integrating the new salesperson into not only the role, but the company and the culture.

Clearly the basics from orientation are included in this process along with a clear role awareness and defined expectation.  Don’t underestimate the importance of role clarity…many companies are woefully deficient in this area.  Onboarding has another key level to it – the start of the retention process.  Integrating the new salesperson into the company culture quickly creates a connection.  If done right, that connection will aid in retaining that salesperson in the future.

Onramping
This approach is our wording used specifically to describe the process of moving new sales hires into revenue production.  The focus is to go beyond the inner walls of the company and develop the salesperson’s understanding of the company’s solutions, advantages and functionality in the marketplace.

Obviously, this approach includes all of the aspects of onboarding.  However, sales requires a concerted effort to “ramp” the salesperson to revenue.  The goal here is to invest the time up front to get the new salesperson in the field selling as fast as possible.  This training involves knowing their sales strengths and weaknesses, preferred communication style and natural aptitudes.  This quantifiable information allows you to tailor the training to the most effective method for that individual.

The topics salespeople need to know are your company’s Differentiating Value (DV).  They need to understand where you compete on the value scale.  The salespeople want to learn the competitive landscape.  They have to know the ideal customer and who to target for prospecting.  There is more to learn, but this sales-focused approach accelerates your new hire’s ramp while putting down a foundation for promoting them in the future.

Speed matters in today’s competitive world.  The need for a structured, sales-focused onramping process leads to a faster ramp to revenue amongst all of your new sales hires.

Learn More About Onramping

   
 

Gathering > Giving

This statement is going to sound blunt, but gathering information is always more important than giving information in a selling process.  This truth may sound counterintuitive to the stereotypical sales process.  However, it is crucial to understand this approach.

The stereotypical thought is that good talkers make good salespeople.  I hear this conventional wisdom every week when dealing with sourcing sales candidates.  It is a well-established belief and it is completely wrong.  Strong salespeople are more closely related to adroit investigators -they ask good questions, pursue the right topics, and drill down on ambiguous responses.

The ability to understand this approach is to first realize who is running a qualifying conversation.  Is it the person talking or the person asking the questions who is controlling the conversation?  If you answered the person asking the questions then you are correct.

The person asking the questions is controlling the topics, choosing the depth of the topic discussion, and gathering the information needed to determine if they have a real prospect or not.  The only way to accomplish these tasks is to allow the potential prospect to share information.  Now granted, prospects are not always eager to share all information and, dare I say it, some prospects (all?) don’t always tell the truth.  The prospects use stalls, objections, misdirection, commissions, etc. to refrain from telling the salesperson all of the details needed to qualify the opportunity.  The prospects’ approach is the reason you must find skilled salespeople to handle qualifying potentially deceptive prospects.

The conventional wisdom in sales hiring is to find “good talkers.”  I cannot count how many times I have been told that a referred sales candidate would do well in a sales role because they are loquacious in speech.  A good conversationalist maybe, a word salad bloviator no.  The first trait to locate in a sales candidate is their questioning ability tied to their listening ability.  You can see these traits in action if you spend 30 min. on a phone screen with them.  You will see their conversational ability in person and, more importantly, you will observe how they question and control a conversation.

You can follow up your findings regarding a potentially strong sales candidate with an in-depth assessment.  The assessment will tell you how they prefer to communicate, what drives their decision-making and what natural abilities they have for accurate listening.  This approach, in concert with an effective phone screen, will help you find stronger, skilled salespeople.

Gather More Today

   
 

Entrepreneurs vs Employees

Your employees are not as committed to your company’s success as you are.  If you are an entrepreneurial owner, this fact is something you must understand.  I have seen this misalignment in many companies and it often leads to turmoil within the culture.

This entrepreneur.com article provides 6 important points for entrepreneurs when leading their company. The first point may be the most important:

1. Employees are equally invested.

Here’s a painful truth: Employees aren’t going to take ownership the way you want them to. If they wanted to be entrepreneurs, they would have taken that path. And it’s good that they’re not as invested as you are — it’s a problem if someone else is more interested in making your business succeed.

This stubborn assumption manifests itself in lots of ways: expecting people to work long hours, making comments that they should feel “grateful” to be a part of something historic, pushing back when employees bring legitimate problems to your desk, etc. This is what you signed up for. It’s not what your employees signed up for unless they took a stake in your company.

Equity is the equalizer, but if you do not offer equity to your employees, you have to understand their mindset.

I have seen this frequently in many privately-owned companies. My thought has always been that this approach has always been a bias from the owner.  The belief is that the employees are as committed to the company’s growth to the point of working long hours, not wanting pay raises, etc.  The employees must share the same desire as the owner to see the company grow.  Yet, the employees are not compensated with any equity.  This misalignment in understanding motivations often leads to exaggerated views of the employees’ commitment to the company.

Here is another common mistake I see in entrepreneurial companies:

6. They can withstand organizational havoc.

Some business owners fall into the anal-retentive, detail-oriented category; others are more comfortable flying by the seat of their pants. If you think running the show means you can leave a trail of dysfunctional processes and contracts in your midst, you’re likely angering teammates on a daily basis.

Employees’s roles definitely exist to lighten entrepreneurs’s loads, but intentionally leaving messes that make their jobs harder won’t do much to earn loyalty or trust. Entrepreneurs are often better starters than finishers, and failing to think one step further to how your actions will affect your teammates can be a nail in the coffin.

Do not underestimate the importance of defining roles even in a small, entrepreneurial company that is in fast-growth mode.  The faster the growth, the more difficult it is to keep your company’s roles defined…and staffed.  Recently, I have seen two different companies struggling with growth.  The issue seems to be twofold:  1) properly staffing up to meet the new demands and 2) defining the roles and responsibilities of each person.

  1. Staffing up is one of the more harrowing investments any entrepreneur has to make.  The business sees a noticeable increase in revenue, but will is be sustained?  If there is any question about the continuity of the revenue stream, the owner is normally hesitant to hire.  The issue now becomes the stress on the existing employees to absorb the increased workload.  If it is temporary, fine, that is part of being an employee.  If it is sustained and then continues to grow, you will have a problem.  The corporate culture will deteriorate as the employees struggle with long days and stressful deadlines.  Hire temporary workers or staff up your team – this risk is part of being a successful entrepreneur.
  2. Fast growth often leads to roles absorbing more and more responsibilities.  The actual tension comes from employees losing track of their primary responsibilities.  Their roles morph into something lacking definition, just activities that have to be covered in a timely manner.  As role responsibilities and expectations become blurred, employees get blindsided by unexpected shifts in these areas.  The important task here is to keep in close contact with your employees and keep their roles clearly defined as the company faces remarkable growth.

The entire article is worth a read for any entrepreneur, or any company facing fast growth in this strong market.  If you need help in hiring the right people or defining the existing roles, we can help.

Contact Us Today

   
 

Bad Hiring Trend-Lack of Decisiveness

This HRE article addresses a worrisome trend in hiring today – slow hiring decisions.

Decisiveness is the most important trait of successful hiring managers.  Lacking today because people are unsure of who they are hiring.  Can use assessments to assuage this fear.

Gartner found that, in 2018, the average time between the initial job interview and the hiring manager making an offer was 33 days—an 84% increase since 2010.

“The longer decision-making stage is causing a 16% reduction in candidates accepting offers,” says Lauren Smith, vice president of Gartner’s HR practice. “Ultimately, hiring managers are losing out on prime candidates because of this lag in decision-making.”

In sales hiring, I suspect this extended time-to-hire is even more pronounced.  Hiring salespeople is the most difficult hire for any company.  Salespeople, even inept ones, can have enough interpersonal skill to short-circuit your hiring process.

There is a way to improve your decision process when hiring.  First, why does it matter?

Decisive hiring managers, Gartner found, hire 10% more high-quality candidates and 11% fewer low-quality candidates than traditional hiring managers—and ultimately reduce time-to-hire by 17%.

Few tasks have a greater impact on a sales leader’s performance than hiring the right salesperson.  The best way to increase your hiring decision process is to incorporate assessments.

Objectivity is the strongest friend you can have when hiring.  Assessments are completely objective and provide a neutral, unvarnished reading of the person.  What motivates them?  Do they have the ideal sales motivation?  How will they sell?  These questions are answered objectively before you ever hire the candidate.

The most reliable method for accelerating your hiring process is to incorporate objective measurement to support your instinctive decision.

We can help.

Contact Us Today

   
 
You Might Like