Health Care Reform | Governance | Law | The Golden Rule
Charlie Green, in his web log,
Trusted Advisor, has invited comments concerning health care and trust. As I like Charlie, and respect the insights he shares - not to mention, the good work he puts into the topic of trust in general - I've become a faithful reader of late.
Here's where you'll find Lark's latest comment - a rant really - which I posted in response to all the chatter related to our sick health care system and its need for reform.
I suspect Charlie likes my sometimes off-the-wall remarks, and I'm grateful he puts up with me. Likewise, I appreciate his digging deep into matters of trust, since I consider it one of the most worthwhile topics in the blogosphere.
And all of us have a voice in this debate regarding health care reform - beginning with that inner voice inside.
What follows is my response to Charlie's response to my rant - that I strike him as "a walking anti-ideologue" - one label I'll proudly wear as a badge of honor.
~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~|~~~~~
As it concerns governance and the rule of law we must be mindful of our individual concepts of free will and the needs of society as a whole.
This is, of course, quite a deft balancing act for mere mortals to achieve - in one lifetime, or from one generation to the next.
In law we have only universal, scientific and man-made laws to consider... followed by moral and ethical codes of behavior.
Reason dictates we employ critical thinking and basic logic to the best of our abilities, and strive to get along.
When any of these conflict with one another we must logically infer we have a problem demanding a more proper solution.
I grew up believing, rightly or wrongly, in The Golden Rule. In fact it's the only thing, in my view, worth remembering about the whole discussion surrounding religion.
We were born into this world naked and without language. Thus, most all knowledge defined in language is borne from false beliefs - lies and factual distortions - or via indoctrination, otherwise informed by authoritarian constructs, which are often little more than lies and distortions built upon other lies and distortions.
And since our knowledge about law is generally derived from empirical evidence, based upon the facts on the ground before us, and our common consensus of learned opinion, we enact man-made rules-of-the-road for all of us to follow.
The framers of our Constitution were painfully aware that men were not created equal - though they bravely deemed it so - and our fortunes as free men were tied to an economic order which presumably rewarded hard work and fair play.
This is precisely where everything begins to unravel. Our assumptions about "the way it is" should always be logically subject to change - as change, for all intents and purposes, is a constant condition within man, nature and the universe.
One wrong turn which discounts natural, universal or scientific law - or ignores The Golden Rule - and man-made law becomes suspect... as just another authoritarian construct... which, sooner or later, will only compel us to enact forcible change... for the benefit of the larger society.
What must also be given a voice in the halls of government... is the air we breathe, the nourishment we take, the water we drink, and the ground we walk on. These things, after all, are as basic to our survival as they are to all other living things.
Healthcare, medicine and law, and those we entrust to administer it, is just as important to our survival as any of these.
Tyranny, as brought about by cognitive dissonance, our common attention deficit trait – even a kind of tyranny-of-words – is anathema to social order, our supposed right to happiness, and our very survival as free-thinking human beings living in a healthful environment.
As social beings cognizant that certain inviolate laws do exist which supersede others... we Americans assume man-made laws will sustain a social and economic order… envisioned by those who crafted the words... in our Declaration of Independence, the Preamble to the Constitution, the Constitution itself, and the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, I grew up believing - again, rightly or wrongly - in the Hippocratic Oath; and the vision of our nation's founders; and my right to agree or disagree with whomever or whatever I encounter… which seeks to enslave me or force me against my will… or seeks my cooperation in a collaborative scheme or arrangement.
I'm not so hard to fathom really. I simply hate tyranny and injustice. And I love pleasure... and the plain and simple truth... wherever and whenever I'm privileged to marvel at its beauty.
Like you and everybody else… my everyday wish is to experience life on reasoned practical terms... which doesn’t harm others.
And God help those who’d refuse to help themselves – as the old saying goes – and anyone who would deign it in their power to rule over me.
I stand for truth and justice – and not much of anything else – which is why I enjoy listening to what you have to say, man!
Though none of us can claim to own the truth entirely, we can at least trust that good common sense and wiser heads seeking of justice will prevail in the end.
As for tolerance... one can only be guided accordingly...
... Because sometimes, without speaking truth to power, we risk leaving it to others to decide our fates.
Teacher's Pet Monkeys
TEACHER: Maria, go to the map and find North America.
MARIA: Here it is.
TEACHER: Correct. Now class, who discovered America?
CLASS: Maria!
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: John, why are you doing your math multiplication on the floor?
JOHN: You told me to do it without using tables.
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: Glenn, how do you spell "crocodile?"
GLENN: K-R-O-K-O-D-I-A-L
TEACHER: No, that's wrong
GLENN: Maybe it is wrong, but you asked me how I spell it.
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: Donald, what is the chemical formula for water?
DONALD: H I J K L M N O
TEACHER: What are you talking about?
DONALD: Yesterday you said it's H to O.
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: Winnie, name one important thing we have
today that we didn't have 10 years ago.
WINNIE: Me!
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: Glen, why do you always get so dirty?
GLEN: Well, I'm a lot closer to the ground than you are.
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: George Washington not only chopped down
his father's cherry tree, but also admitted it. Now, Louie, do you
know why his father didn't punish him?
LOUIE: Because George still had the ax in his hand?
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: Now, Simon, tell me frankly, do you say prayers before eating?
SIMON: No sir, I don't have to, my Mom is a good cook.
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: Clyde, your composition on "My Dog" is
exactly the same as your brother's. Did you copy his?
CLYDE: No, teacher, it's the same dog.
~~~|~~~
TEACHER: Harold, what do you call a person who keeps
on talking when people are no longer interested?
HAROLD: A teacher?
Resplendent Noise
Dave Lakhani has received a link to an interesting article over at The Washington Post from
Ben Mack, and he's generously shared it in his blog at
Bold Approach.
Entitled
Pearls Before Breakfast,
Gene Weingarten, in the April 8th issue, says
"Can one of the nation's great musicians cut through the fog of a D.C. rush hour? Let's find out."
In the article the Post writer documents a social experiment in well-written detail, which was a marvel to behold.
His conclusions are powerful... and instructive. And the article... was a joy to read.
Dave suggested it is a "direct reflection of your audience and the reaction to your performance" - meaning, at least partly, a reference to its lesson for furthering our marketing efforts, I took it.
So, as a marketing noob, of course, I checked it out.
Then I felt compelled to weigh in, to expand the dialog, so to speak - so as to release my inner chatter!
And in case you don't already know, we wannabe writers like to kick this stuff out a lotta times anyway - which is why we live like hermits. :)
************************************************************************************
Dear Dave,
My hat's off to you and Ben for sharing this article.
I thoroughly enjoyed receiving the vibe - that's New Age-speak for telling me about the noise!
It's no wonder we tend to tune out noise - even the so-called
good noise - as we have so much noise going on inside our own heads... we must necessarily filter out... the competition from outside... to be heard.
The article you and Ben cite is a perfect illustration of this phenomenon.
It seems much of what we employ as influence and persuasion tactics today must be focused on how it is we can appeal to people's finely-tuned sense of self-centeredness and conscious greed - as most of us are hell-bent on getting heard...
... By that selfish inner chatter... which resides within...
all of us.
[Bottom line: Hey, it's still only about survival, baby!]
And so people wrapped up in themselves... with their problems... their seeking of everyday pleasure and fulfillment at every turn... is where we often begin.
Especially if our aim is to target them... to illustrate an object lesson... as is the case in the Post article.
However, another way might be to start by realizing this kind of
epidemic behavior is actually a good thing... and the way to penetrate this mindset... is to reverse engineer our thoughts... of
constantly thinking... in order to make a more valuable and calculating appeal... to this,
our common affliction.
Though we instinctively know we must start with emotion and sensory perception, it's not always from a commonality of meaning or purpose.
Then we start to question whether appealing, objectifying, and targeting is really the best strategy in the first place.
So let's consider this beforehand.
"Children accumulate virtually no memory until they have language."
"Consciousness is self-awareness... characterized by language... which facilitates inner narration."
"Consciousness IS language. Like with certain words, images, feelings and perceptions... good music is thought to be useful
good noise - as it supposedly emanates from the same natural vibratory impulse as
sensory stimulation + conjured immediate thought = emotional desire, followed by the desperate want, then the perceived need to control."
History is replete with examples,
ad infinitum, of all the ways we've put into place... and attempted to implement... control over others.
[And I wonder: Will this forever be so critical to our economic survival?]
When communication professionals become accomplished, then sullied by these many
infectious words - marketers... admen, public relation, media and brand specialists... propaganda experts - are they put on this earth to zero in on those certain flaws in our human character, so all the
others now become our targets?
And these
many more others - likely referred to as informed consumers - really do eat up all this attention... because all of us, it turns out, really pine for these... same
dirty words!
But we all have our crosses to bear, and someone has to dish out these dirty words we love so much... because
burning desire, like for more money, or certain pleasures, has crept up on us all, hasn't it?
Earth + Air + Water + Fire = LIFE
It's part-and-parcel of our capitalist system... and
T-I-N-A... THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE (Margaret Thatcher)... still stands as our universally accepted credo.
[Though nothing has fundamentally changed... maybe we can at least be awakened to new possibilities... if it's true our survival hangs in the balance.]
So for the sake of our own amusement, disregarding for a moment all other motivating factors, let's assume we really are brainwashed.
Submitting ourselves... to conscious-driven... incessant... dissonant... inner chatter - right from the get-go!
Have we come to accept this observation to be a part of our basic instinct for survival and self-preservation - as evidenced by our common behavior patterns - to blithely be seen walking around... talking to ourselves?
Isn't this what is characteristic of hapless patients in insane asylums?
[Just wondering... if it's not okay... just say so. But can we be completely honest with ourselves?]
Anyway, without digressing further, let's make a determination.
Do we want to approach this issue as one of war, like what is studied at war colleges, or from what we learned in The Art of War (Sun Tzu)?
Or do we want to try a less aggressive, maybe more feminine, non-judgmental method instead?
Wherein might lie the clue... in our determination... for fresh and bold approach?
Should we tally up all our common emotional and sensory attributes... and begin redeployment? In preparation for another more all-encompassing assault on the senses?
Rather than... just one... of
resplendent noise... shown, by example, in the Post's experiment?
Must we also consider bringing on some assorted jugglers, mimes, slapstick comedians, carnival barkers, town criers, unclothed bodies, compelling
objets d'art, even free food and drink to add to the mix - just for teasers - in order to gain this promise of requisite attention?
Then tweak and test the mix for desired effect?
[Why the hell not? Sounds like a party to me! Can I come? Can I? Can I?]
Could it be if we stop to unthink... then re-create the conditions for a “stiller” serenity – uncluttered by foolish inner chatter... the falsely-perceived ravages of time... not spent in the here-and-now... and disparate stupid pursuits... always running to-and-fro – we might more easily cause the violinist gainful notice... to get the worthy gentleman... some damn attention please?
Or perhaps we should search for the single common thread of least resistance - at the very least - first?
Mind
Mind-blowing
Mind-boggling
Mind-expanding
Mindful
Mindfulness
Minding
Mindless
Mind reading
Mindset
Mind’s-Eye
Mindshare
For what useful purpose does it serve if we ill-consider empowerment and enrichment, the same energy which allows us all to be present... and so motivated to go on about our busy-ness?
And where might these conditions best be perfected – or exploited?
The public square (in the case of the author’s article you shared, L'Enfant Plaza, near the Metro, in Washington D.C.) – or in individual hearts and minds?
Where does critical thinking, preconceived notions about acculturative value equations, or propaganda fit into this scenario?
Are we not fighting a losing battle?
Have we thoroughly examined our assumptions – or questioned our motives for self-aggrandizement?
And what is the highest, most noble good we can derive from all this, our amusement and our chatter... our exquisite enrichment... and longing for ecstatic experience - even if the
meaning of meaning is held over... for another day?
Finally, shouldn't we reconsider... an examination... of
thoughtforms...
egregores... s'more
memes... to further explore?
Then determine if, by their
alignment, we can be made to feel more useful... by virtue of our newfound purpose... after that?
Some innocent things... always beggar us for answers...
... Which is why... I'm glad to be... on your mailing list.
I know... like Ben... you entertain these foolish questions too!
All the best,
Lark
[Notes: Perhaps the social experiment described in the Post article would have drawn different conclusions from the author if the musician selected was a viola (more masculine tonality) player instead of a violinist (the violin being higher-pitched, with a more feminine tonality).
A lone youngish professional woman, Stacy Furukawa, was Joshua Bell’s most-attuned and active audience participant - and his best customer. (Is this what the author meant by "... cute elides into hott", an added impetus for Ms. Furukawa to notice his playing?) Near the end of his performance she cheerfully laid down a twenty... into his violin case... amazed by the scene around her!
Previously, John Picarello, "a smallish and baldish man" - and a true classical music fan - took no note of Joshua Bell's celebrity. After watching and listening appreciatively - for nearly ten whole minutes - he tossed a fiver in the case.
This is but one example of how we can learn more about ourselves by performing similar exercises.
See the plot details in Shakespeare’s comedy,
Twelfth Night, or
What You Will - particularly the antics of Feste, the resident fool! :)]
Tags:
Pearls Before Breakfast, Gene Weingarten, Dave Lakhani, Ben Mack, Mark and Lark, Washington Post, Meaning, Language, Music, Commonality of Purpose, Resplendent Noise
