Click here to read this mailing online.
"Larry Ferlazzo's Websites of the Day…" - 5 new articles
Here’s What A Recent Meta-Analysis On Reading Instruction Found RosZie / Pixabay
Interventions for students with reading difficulties in Grades 4-12: A systematic review and meta-analysis is a new study that’s not behind a paywall. Unfortunately, it’s also another all-too-common example of researchers writing up a study that few, if any, teachers are going to worth through to learn findings useful to classroom practice. After re-reading it a couple of time, and asking ChatGPT for help, here is what seems to be the primary conclusions:
Fair enough. But you really have to dig to find out what specific “structure comprehension instruction” they’re talking about. Here’s where ChatGPT came in (I’m adding this info to The Best Posts On Reading Strategies & Comprehension – Help Me Find More!): Here are the specific types of structured comprehension strategies that were common in the studies reviewed — and that align with what showed positive effects: 1️⃣ Explicit Strategy Instruction (Teacher-Modeled)These interventions typically used a gradual release model:
Common strategies taught explicitly:
This is not generic discussion — it is direct instruction in how to think while reading. 2️⃣ Text Structure InstructionMany comprehension programs in Grades 4–12 explicitly taught:
Students were taught to:
This is particularly powerful in secondary content areas. 3️⃣ Reciprocal Teaching–Type ApproachesSome interventions used structured discussion formats involving:
The key is that these roles are explicitly taught and practiced, not assumed. 4️⃣ Inference TrainingAdolescents with reading difficulties often struggle with inferencing. Effective interventions included:
5️⃣ Vocabulary Embedded in ComprehensionBecause vocabulary had the strongest overall effect in the meta-analysis many effective comprehension programs integrated:
This suggests comprehension instruction works best when paired with word knowledge work. 6️⃣ Multicomponent Structured ProgramsThe review found that multicomponent interventions were common and effective These typically combined:
Rather than isolating one skill. 7️⃣ Scaffolded Practice with FeedbackSuccessful programs were structured with:
Not loosely facilitated discussion. What This Means PracticallyFor Grades 4–12 struggling readers, “comprehension instruction” that works tends to be: ✔ Explicit
It is not:
If You’re Thinking About Classroom ApplicationThe strongest evidence from this review suggests that in upper grades:
     Research Studies Of The Week Mohamed_hassan / Pixabay I often write about research studies from various fields and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature. You can see all my “Best” lists related to education research here. Here are some new useful studies (and related resources):
HELPING STUDENTS MAKE IT TO COLLEGE: EVIDENCE-BASED DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR REDUCING SUMMER MELT is from Ed Research For Action.
Growth Mindset, PISA and the Limits of Correlation is from Experience To Meaning.
 This Week’s “Round-Up” Of Useful Posts & Articles On Ed Policy Issues
Here are some recent useful posts and articles on educational policy issues (You might also be interested in seeing all my “Best” lists related to education policy here):
Younger Students’ Test Scores Bounce Back After the Pandemic is from The NY Times. Majority of City Council Members Urge Mamdani to Pause A.I. in Schools is from The NY Times. July 1 brings big student loan changes. Here’s what you need to know is from NPR.
Tom Kane has tracked years of U.S. test scores. Here’s what he’s learned — and still can’t explain. is from Chalkbeat.
Are Teachers Still Satisfied with Their Jobs? A Surprising Look at 16 Years of TALIS Data is from From Experience To Meaning. 2026 KIDS COUNT Data Book is from The Annie E. Casey Foundation.  Today Is The 44th Anniversary Of The Plyler v. Doe Supreme Court Decision – Here Are Learning & Teaching Resources Yamu_Jay / Pixabay
Today is the 44th anniversary of Plyler v. Doe Supreme Court decision. You might be interested in THE BEST RESOURCES FOR LEARNING ABOUT THE PLYLER DECISION NOW THAT RIGHT-WINGERS ARE PLANNING A PUSH TO MAKE MIGRANT CHILDREN PAY TO ATTEND SCHOOL.  Study Suggests That Enhanced Agency Contributes To Benefits Students Gain When They Teach Their Classmates
I’ve always figured that the main reason students benefit from teaching their classmates through jigsaws and other strategies is because they concentrate more on learning the material. Now, researchers suggest that there’s another reason student “teachers” benefit academically from doing it – teaching provides them an increased sense of power and agency that directly translates towards them learning better. The Powerful Teacher: A Power Hypothesis for the Benefits of Learning-by-Teaching is an open-access study that’s very interesting, though it’s a bit dense. I asked ChatGPT to explain it in more simple terms to me.
Here’s what it said: The researchers argue that part of why students benefit when they teach others is because teaching increases their sense of power, and that increased sense of power helps their learning in specific ways. Here’s how and why the authors say that works: 📌 1. Taking on a teacher role gives students a feeling of powerIn their experiment, students were put into three different conditions:
Students in the teaching condition reported feeling more powerful — meaning they felt more able to influence and control others’ understanding of the material — than students in the other two groups. This sense of power wasn’t just about feeling confident in the information — it was about social influence: they were producing something that others would rely on. 📌 2. This sense of power boosts learning outcomesThe researchers found that:
In other words, it wasn’t just that teaching required deeper processing — it was that stepping into a teaching role gave students a psychological shift (a feeling of power over the learning context) that helped them perform better on complex tasks. 📌 3. Why “power” matters for learningThe authors propose what they call a “power hypothesis of learning-by-teaching”:
The authors describe this as a novel mechanism behind learning-by-teaching — not just that teaching forces elaboration but that feeling powerful improves how students engage with and generate new knowledge. 🧠 How this connects to broader researchThis idea fits with other educational theories suggesting that student agency — the feeling that learners can influence outcomes or others — enhances motivation and deeper learning. Research on learner autonomy shows that when students feel more control or influence over their environment, their engagement and motivation increase, which supports better learning. 🟡 SummaryIn this study, teaching others seems to help learning not only because it makes you process material more deeply, but because it changes how students see themselves: it gives them a sense of power in the learning process, and that sense of power boosts their ability to generate new research questions and engage with material on a higher level
I then asked it this question: So, previous studies, and my own understanding, suggests that the “teachers” benefit because they have to learn the content more in order to teach it. This study says that no, the key reason is because of the sense of agency that the student teachers feel? Here’s the response: No, this study does not say content-processing doesn’t matter.
Here’s the distinction. 🧠 The Traditional Explanation (What You’re Referring To)Most “learning-by-teaching” research argues that student teachers benefit because they:
This is often called:
In that framework, the benefit is largely cognitive. 🔎 What This Study AddsThis study proposes a “power hypothesis” — meaning:
So it’s not:
It’s:
💡 What They Found That’s DifferentIn their design, they compared:
All of those require processing. But the teaching group:
The key finding:
That’s the novel contribution. 🧭 How “Power” Changes CognitionPsychologically, feeling powerful tends to:
So the authors argue:
That shift enhances certain kinds of thinking — especially creative, generative, higher-order thinking. 🎯 So What’s the Real Takeaway?It’s not:
It’s:
Traditional view:
This study adds:
🏫 In Practical Terms (For Your Classroom Thinking)If the power/agency explanation holds up, it suggests:
So the mechanism may depend on:
That’s potentially important for classroom design.
I’m adding this info to: The Best Resources On Student Agency & How To Encourage It The Best Posts On Helping Students Teach Their Classmates — Help Me Find More  More Recent Articles
|
