PEN America has the explanatory article we had been hoping for since we found out that Jane Eyre was now banned in some public schools in the US. The schools where it has been banned are in Texas. Women in Texas were once in the thrall of Charlotte Bronte and her literary masterpiece Jane Eyre. Back in the mid-1800s, Texans, along with the reading public as a whole, made the novel an immediate bestseller when it was published in 1848. Seven years later, a schoolteacher organized the Texas Bronte Club, a milestone that created a literary gathering place and boasted a lending library that years later evolved into the Victoria Public Library. Though it ultimately became a civic organization that did good works in communities, books continued to hold a prominent place in the society’s programs. The group thrived well into the 20th century, retaining its standing as the oldest literary group in the state and even once hosting a lecture by First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt. Fast forward to 2026. Today the great Victorian-era romance novel with a pioneering feminist message has earned a new place in Texas history —an infamous one— with four school districts banning it as unsuitable for younger readers. This is happening, it’s worth noting, at the same time that China made Jane Eyre compulsory reading for 14 and 15 year olds. Why? As a counter to social media and its touting of “materialistic culture and money.” You’re not alone if the Texas ban on Jane Eyre is a head scratcher. After all, the book is consistently near the top of major literary canons, has been on school reading lists, likely for over a century, has no steamy content at all, and has been adapted for as many as 25 to 30 movies and television series, most rated PG. [...] So why did four school districts in Texas decide to remove this celebrated, classic novel from its libraries, picking up the aging thread of distaste from Victorian critics? The 19th century’s favorite orphan is likely a casualty of the Texas legislature. Since the passage of the SB 13 law in 2025, school administrators and librarians have found it impossible to confidently interpret the labels “profane” and “indecent” — part of the new, lower bar for what makes a book bannable in Texas. As a result, some districts have placed restrictions on anything written for adults, including classics. Restrictions across four districts include banned pending investigation (removed from shelves, sometimes indefinitely); restricted to upper grade levels; and limiting only to AP English students. Some people will say age restrictions are normal, even good sense. The case of Jane Eyre shows the harm these measures can do. Young readers who become lifelong readers often benefit from reading above grade level, reading challenging prose that gives them a window into history. Denying them that opportunity limits their horizons. “Generations of young people, especially young women, have discovered a love of classic literature through the works of the Brontë sisters, reading above grade level to do so,” said Philomena Polefone, a senior manager of PEN’s Freedom to Read team and an author of the recent report. “Jane Eyre is a book that inspires young people to love reading and brings them into the library. What continues to be clear during Banned Books Week and every week is that book bans pose a threat not only to literacy and education but to democracy and pluralism. At PEN America, we believe that all students — and all parents — benefit when kids are given more choices of what to read, and encouraged to read freely. To those who spend time concocting dubious reasons to ban books, or (this being the 21st century) having AI do it for them, perhaps it’s time to heed the advice of Jane Eyre’s friend Helen Burns, who says: “Life appears to me too short to be spent in nursing animosity or registering wrongs.” (Suzanne Trimel)
It's so sad to have come to this. Still, Charlotte Brontë herself replies to those who would ban her book. From the preface of Jane Eyre: Having thus acknowledged what I owe those who have aided and approved me, I turn to another class; a small one, so far as I know, but not, therefore, to be overlooked. I mean the timorous or carping few who doubt the tendency of such books as “Jane Eyre:” in whose eyes whatever is unusual is wrong; whose ears detect in each protest against bigotry—that parent of crime—an insult to piety, that regent of God on earth. I would suggest to such doubters certain obvious distinctions; I would remind them of certain simple truths. Conventionality is not morality. Self-righteousness is not religion. To attack the first is not to assail the last. To pluck the mask from the face of the Pharisee, is not to lift an impious hand to the Crown of Thorns. These things and deeds are diametrically opposed: they are as distinct as is vice from virtue. Men too often confound them: they should not be confounded: appearance should not be mistaken for truth; narrow human doctrines, that only tend to elate and magnify a few, should not be substituted for the world-redeeming creed of Christ. There is—I repeat it—a difference; and it is a good, and not a bad action to mark broadly and clearly the line of separation between them.
Anyway, back on the other side of the pond there's a musical on stage based on this now-banned book and a contributor to The Conversation reviews it. The reviewer is an 'Emeritus Reader in English' who takes issue with the musical missing 'the novel’s darkness' yet can't spell Brontë properly consistently. Caird’s justification for this reduction is compelling. In an interview, he described Jane Eyre as “fundamentally an intimate, emotional, small-scale work”, pointing to the novel’s first-person narration and its intensely interior focus. But Jane Eyre is not a “small-scale work”. Certainly, Jane’s journey takes her through only a handful of Yorkshire houses and a school. Yet Brontë’s imagination repeatedly exceeds these confines. The novel conjures supernatural forces, wild landscapes and sweeping moorland. Its emotional world is equally expansive, moving from the warmth of passion to the terror of fire and freezing wastes. Its Yorkshire landscapes convey a strange, almost supernatural power. The result is a novel that constantly stretches beyond the limits of Jane’s confined domestic world. [...] Taking my seat at Southwark Playhouse, I was struck by how effectively Morgan Large’s set balances intimacy with gothic grandeur. It captures the small scale Caird sought for this chamber production, while suggesting a much wider and eerier world beyond the stage. The palette is black and white. The set backdrop is a video screen showing a slowly moving landscape of clouds, bare trees and wintry moorland. There is even a bit of mist rising. Stage right and left are clothes horses draped with everyday cloaks, pristine white shirts, nightshirts and caps. These have a prosaic quality and bring the audience close to a theatrical version of Brönte’s domestic realism. However, even these well-starched clothes are imbued with a ghostly quality, bereft as they are of wearers and lit in sharp contrast to the black backdrop. It is a clever combination of the ghostly and the mundane, which renders the most familiar things uncanny. Jane Eyre: a Musical abounds in excellent performances, exciting staging and orchestration, but despite the verve of the ensemble cast and the vocal crescendos, the heart rarely skips a beat in fear – and certainly not in gothic terror. This is largely due to the awkwardness and confusion in the representation of Bertha, who is little more than an obstacle in Jane and Rochester’s romance. Played by Hannah Lindsay, she appears veiled in pale lace wedding clothes, her face obscured. Even when she attacks Rochester, Lindsay’s long blonde curls hide her face. Brönte’s creation of the violent, swollen-featured, monstrous Bertha who also has bad breath and hasn’t brushed her hair is problematic to a modern audience. She is Creole and she is insane. What may once have appeared as a gothic representation of madness, now raises difficult questions about race, colonialism, gender and confinement. Even without having read Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) or the seminal feminist study The Madwoman in the Attic (1979), modern audiences approach Bertha with a different understanding of colonial history than that of Brontë’s time. However, the answer is not to erase Bertha as a gothic force, which this production does. At one point we even see Bertha carrying a doll. If directors John Caird and Megan McGinnis choose to depict her as a childish innocent our sympathies must lie with her – but this sympathy goes nowhere and she is still removed as an obstacle to the romantic plot. Jane Eyre is so rich in imagery and intricate plot that three hours can never do it justice. However, more could have been done in this production. The musical offers a touching love story and a moving tale of a young woman’s struggles. Yet the novel’s much darker narrative is absent. Brontë creates this shadow narrative through gothic elements including dreams, Bessie’s local folklore and folk song, premonitions and monstrous night visitations, mysterious voices and uncanny laughter. A reference to Bessie’s folksong about the “orphan child” crossing the cold moors could have enriched the music. Most crucially, Brontë mirrors Bertha and Jane throughout the novel, but this mirroring is largely absent from the production. That is particularly striking because of the set’s prominent bird imagery. A plinth around three sides of the stage bears Jane’s declaration to Rochester: “I am no bird; and no net ensnares me: I am a free human being with an independent will.” [...] The production’s confused portrayal of Bertha leaves little room for this gothic threat. Yet the novel repeatedly uses images of wildness and savagery to align the two women. These connections matter, particularly when Bertha’s role is so heavily downplayed. The musical misses the alignment of the two women. In Sweet Liberty, Jane (played beautifully by Charlie Burn) sings of “boundless skies” and declares: “I will fly.” Yet there is no reference to Bertha, the woman literally confined at Thornfield who ultimately flies from its roof. Bertha has no voice, and she certainly does not get a song. (Sophie Gilmartin)
And yet the musical is an adaptation of the actual novel, not of its afterlife and different readings and retellings.
According to Looper, Jane Eyre 2011 is one of '5 Movies To Watch If You Like Anne Hathaway's Verity'. Jane Eyre (2011) It's quite possible that Cary Joji Fuku[n]aga's 2011 adaptation of "Jane Eyre," the massively influential dark romance written by Charlotte Brontë, flew under your radar upon its release. If you love "Verity," though, this is another pick — like "Rebecca" — where you can clearly see the story's influence on writers like Colleen Hoover. Mia Wasikowska plays the titular Jane, who endured a difficult childhood as an orphan and thinks that her life will be forever changed when, as an adult, she meets the dashing and wealthy Mr. Rochester (Michael Fassbender) while working as a governess at his property of Thornfield Hall. Despite Mr. Rochester's apparent betrothal to the beautiful Blanche Ingram (Imogen Poots), Jane finds herself developing feelings for him, and he returns them ardently. There's just one small problem, and it has to do with an attic and a spate of small fires — and even though "Jane Eyre" is an old story that's probably familiar to most people, we won't get into the specifics just in case you don't know how this wonderfully twisted story ends. Wasikowska and Fassbender are excellent and flanked by great performers like Dame Judi Dench, Jamie Bell, Sally Hawkins, Tamzin Merchant, and Simon McBurney, making this adaptation of "Jane Eyre" a worthy watch once you're finished with "Verity." (Nina Starner)
Vulture recommends 'The 12 Must-See Movies on Prime Video This Month' and one of them is Wuthering Heights 2026. The divisive adaptation from the director of Saltburn and Promising Young Woman is finally on Prime Video for anyone looking for something other than horror this October. How does one even begin to describe this lavish, arguably ridiculous film? You kinda need to see it for yourself and decide what you think of the work of Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi in a movie that equal numbers of people loved and hated when it dropped in February of this year. (Brian Tallerico) A contributor to Coast Community News does a round-up of some book-to-film adaptations and gives Wuthering Heights 2009 an 8.5/10 and Wuthering Heights 2026 a 5/10. Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë The only published novel by Emily Brontë, Wuthering Heights is the beautifully crafted, haunting story of the enthusiastic love between the tortured Heathcliff and Catherine Earnshaw, the daughter of Heathcliff’s benefactor. First published in 1847 under the pseudonym Ellis Bell, Wuthering Heights was remarkable for its unflinching and honest portrayal of obsessive love and its accompanying cruelty, which was out of character for novels of the era. It’s been adapted for the stage and screen many times, most recently as a major motion picture starring Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi. For me the adaptation was a step too far away from the original. I love Margot but she can no longer pass as a 20-year-old, and the wardrobe was not something you would have seen from a wealthy family in the Yorkshire Moors. There must be an authentic honesty to our classics, and if you do want to watch an adaptation, I would go for the Tom Hardy 2009 version. I give this latest adaptation 5/10 and the 2009 adaptation 8.5/10. (Julie Chessman)
Epigram has a review of Sense and Sensibility 2026 and yes, there's a random passing comment of Wuthering Heights 2026 in it. Sense and Sensibility (2026) proves you don't need a varnished scene of oral sex backed by the latest Charli XCX track to demonstrate an undying passion between lovers. Georgia Oakley's Austen adaptation has everything Emerald Fennell's Wuthering Heights (2026) lacked. (Alice Lewis)
You would think no one ever adapted a book before Emerald Fennell as it seems to have turned into a benchmark. And we will add something else now that Jane Eyre is a banned book (surely--and sadly--Wuthering Heights will eventually find itself on the list too unless things change radically, which doens't seem likely at this point): all the pruddishness and pearl-clutching displayed in reviews ever since Wuthering Heights 2026 premiered in cinemas back in February is only fodder for book banning. Condemning a film director's artistic decisions in the terms we have been seeing since February is only a step away from condeming an author's artistic decisions and having their books banned. Criticise creative liberty at your own risk.
A contributor to La Prensa (Nicaragua) compares Jane Eyre to Gioconda Belli's Las fiebres de la memoria. An alert from the Ilkley Literature Festival: Saturday 10th October, 11:00 am Ilkley Grammar School, Cowpasture Rd, Ilkley LS29 8TR, United Kingdom
Join us for a book group discussion led by writer and Programme Manager at First Story Naomi Frisby on the gothic masterpiece Wuthering Heights. Read the book, talk about it with your friends or your regular book group, then come to this Saturday morning session to share your thoughts with other booklovers.
SHE She lives on a moor in the north. She lives alone. Spring opens like a blade there. I travel all day on trains and bring a lot of books—
some for my mother, some for me including The Collected Works Of Emily Brontë. This is my favourite author.
Also my main fear, which I mean to confront. Whenever I visit my mother I feel I am turning into Emily Brontë,
my lonely life around me like a moor, my ungainly body stumping over the mud flats with a look of transformation that dies when I come in the kitchen door. What meat is it, Emily, we need?
Our congratulations to Anne Carson, winner of the 2026 Nobel Prize in Literature. 'The Glass Essay' is full of references to Emily Brontë like the above.
CBC has a 'crash course in Anne Carson' which mentions 'The Glass Essay': Glass, Irony and God, Carson's 1995 book, features the celebrated poem The Glass Essay, which is more than 30 pages long and tells the story of a love affair coming to an end through a reading of Emily Brontë's poetry. In the Nobel Prize ceremony, it was praised by the Swedish Academy for demonstrating "the potential of the long poem where genre boundaries are seen to blur." (Talia Kliot)
We wish this contributor to The New York Times would have used the proper spelling of Brontë: Glass, Irony & God (1995) This collection of three narrative poems contains “The Glass Essay,” a 36-page epic that interweaves the end of a romantic relationship with musings on Emily Brönte, whom Carson describes as a perpetual “whacher” — a deliberate misspelling — who constantly observes the English moors that inspired her novel “Wuthering Heights.” In Brönte, Carson finds kinship and a means of verbalizing her heartbreak. The author Anthony Doerr has referred to “The Glass Essay” as his favorite poem, writing that “it feels to me like a thousand floodlights switching on.” (Ash Wu)
The 1990s brought some of her most celebrated work. "The Glass Essay," from Glass, Irony, and God (1995), shows what the long poem can do when genre lines blur. It is a verse narrative about grief and unrequited love. A woman abandoned by her husband travels to see her lonely mother on the moors, carrying the works of her favourite writer, Emily Brontë. Brontë's moorland and inner life are woven through the text, and the poem becomes at once a reading of Brontë and an essay on abandonment.
"You remember too much, my mother said to me recently. Why hold onto all that? And I said, Where can I put it down?" This quote is from the long, lyrical poem "The Glass Essay" published in Anne Carson's 1995 collection "Glass, Irony and God" — an entry point into the works of the 2026 Nobel Prize for Literature laureate. In the poem, the narrator explores the burden of memory and obsessive desire after a failed love affair, all while regularly reflecting on Emily Brontë — an author renowned for her intense literary depiction of destructive and passionate love in "Wuthering Heights." (Elizabeth Grenier)
WAPT quotes what Anders Olsson, chair of the Nobel Literature Committee, had to say about her work: Carson's wide-ranging influences, from the ancient Greeks to John Keats, Virginia Woolf and Emily Bronte, lead "to playful and ironic works that move not only between classical and modern poetry but also between different genres and art forms," Olsson said. (Pontus Lundahl)
Among the works highlighted by the Nobel Committee was The Glass Essay (1995), a long poem about a woman recovering from a failed relationship who visits her mother in the moorlands, bringing with her the writings of Emily Bronte. Olsson said the work demonstrated Carson's ability to combine poetry, storytelling and literary criticism, with the narrator's experiences becoming entwined with those of her mother and Bronte. “The poetry needs the story, and the story is in turn given energy by the leaps and scene shifts of poetry,” he said. (William Mullally)
La Gaceta (Argentina) highlights some translated poems of hers, including the one with which we began this post.
The Economist comments on the fact that Jane Eyre is now a mandatory read for teenagers in China. “Reader, I married him,” opens the last chapter of “Jane Eyre”. That famous line is music to Chinese officials’ ears. Since September the Victorian-era Bildungsroman by Charlotte Brontë has become compulsory reading for every Chinese student in secondary school. The government happens to be keen to boost marriage rates and babymaking, and worries about women’s rising demand for divorces. The independent-minded heroine, Ms Eyre, who rejects two proposals before ultimately marrying and bearing a son, has a thing or two to teach young Chinese, the Communist Party thinks. By some estimates, China’s population of 1.4bn could be 250m lower by 2050. So the party, having once imposed strict limits on births, is now intensifying efforts to build a “birth-friendly society”. It isn’t doing well. In the first half of 2026 marriage rates fell by 7.5%, while divorce rates climbed by 3.9%. Last year births were at a historic low: less than half the number a decade earlier. In June the government launched a two-month campaign to crack down on microdramas that promote “money worship” and “distorted marriage values”. The wildly popular short videos often tell absurd or fantastical stories, including the popular genre of badao zongcai which involve domineering CEOs who sweep poor women off their feet (this type particularly appeals to those who think social mobility is becoming much harder in China). So why promote “Jane Eyre”? Some commenters on social media call it a prototype of badao zongcai. In the book, Ms Eyre, a governess from a poor background, captures the heart of her wealthy employer, Edward Rochester. His imperious, moody air fits that of the short-videos’ stereotype CEO. But a recent column in Beijing Daily, an official newspaper, makes the point clear: “Jane believes that love should be built on spiritual equality rather than social status, wealth or appearance. Only when two people truly love one another can they attain genuine happiness.” Some parents object to students in their mid-teens having to study a book so centred on love, Beijing Daily admits. But “Jane Eyre” is deeply ingrained in China’s literary consciousness: the first translation appeared in 1917. An adaptation of it was among the first Western films shown in China after the death of Mao in 1976. President Xi Jinping mentioned the book in 2015 during a visit to Britain. A musical version was performed in Beijing this week. Ms Eyre seemed feisty to Victorians. But she is a far cry from feminists in China today whom Mr Xi sees as a threat to procreation.
Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys Antoinette Cosway is a Creole heiress living in 19th-century Jamaica. After Antoinette’s brother dies in a house fire, grief drives their mother mad, and Antoinette is left alone to face a hostile world. An arranged marriage brings her under the control of the cruel and capricious Mr. Rochester who renames her Bertha, isolates her from the outside world and eventually takes her to his native England, where a dark future awaits. Published in 1966, “Wide Sargasso Sea” is a classic in its own right, bringing immense humanity and empathy to the “madwoman in the attic” of Charlotte Brontë’s “Jane Eyre.” Here's how Bright Lights begins a review of A Sudden Flicker of Light: A Revisionist History of the Movies by David Thomson. For as long as film has been around, people have been anxious about what it can do. To understand this anxiety, look to literature: a medium we have been anxious about for a much longer time. In The Republic, Plato cautions that “the tales which the young first hear should be models of virtuous thoughts. . . . A young person cannot judge what is allegorical and what is literal.” Over two thousand years later, Charlotte Brontë wrote a similar warning beside Shakespeare and Byron’s names on her list of recommended reading for a friend. “Don’t be startled at the names,” she cautioned Ellen Nussey. “You will know how to choose the good, and to avoid the evil.” But should she get waylaid, Brontë discouraged her from reading the comedies. In her own folios, she tore them out. Notice her precision: read Shakespeare, but skip the comedies. She is familiar with what she critiques. To decide what not to read, one must first know what is in those books – and then, having done so, decide whether or not to put them down. (Iris Chen)
MovieWeb highlights the '7 most divisive movies of 2026' and one of them is 'Wuthering Heights' The Adaptation Was Accused of Turning a Dark Story Into a Traditional Romance Why Wuthering Heights Was Divisive: From the second news broke that Jacob Elordi was cast as Heathcliff, Wuthering Heights was accused of whitewashing its lead character. With each new piece of promotional material, it became clear that director Emerald Fennell's take on Wuthering Heights would differ significantly from the original source material, opting for a more straightforward forbidden romance that forgoes the book's traditional ending. This earned the film criticism at release, but Wuthering Heights has so far proved to be the biggest hit of WB's 2026 slate, making a reported profit of $40 million (via Variety). Why It's Worth Watching: The criticism that Wuthering Heights isn't a faithful adaptation of the book is valid, but no film adaptation has chosen to depict the book's second half, so that fault is not exclusive to the 2026 version. There is something magical about seeing a female filmmaker be given the freedom and budget by a studio to turn a deeply personal passion project into a major studio production. In the end, Wuthering Heights is a gorgeous film in terms of production design and cinematography, with a fantastic set of original songs by Charlie [sic] XCX. (Richard Fink)
Today, October 9, an amateur production of Emily Brontë, Teenage Necromancer, opens in Sequim, WA:
Written by Don Zolidis October 9th - 25th Olympic Theatre Arts 414 N Sequim Ave Sequim, WA 98382 US
1835. Northern England. The moors. A terrifying phantom has appeared at the Roe Head School for Girls, terrorizing its students and driving the school near to extinction. It’s up to star pupil Emily Brontë, and her sisters Anne and Charlotte, to discern the true nature of the haunting, using their unique talents—which happen to include necromancy. A gothic, hilarious ride through English literature that needs magic, ghosts, and fog; featuring an undead goose, a lovesick ghost, and a talking meat pudding.
The Bookseller reports that Ravena Guron is going to write a murder-mystery retelling of Jane Eyre.Author of YA murder-mysteries including This Book Kills, and YA Book Prize and Nibbie shortlistee Ravena Guron is to pen a murder-mystery retelling of Jane Eyre, after being approached with the idea by Scholastic. (Maia Snow) Later today, the Nobel Prize in Literature will be announced, and Dutch News thinks that The Song of Stork and Dromedary author Anjet Daanje is a serious contender. Novelist Anjet Daanje has been tipped as a serious contender for the Nobel prize in literature and, from her 2022 work The Song of Stork and Dromedary, for very good reason. Published in Dutch as Het lied van ooievaar en dromedaris, the book is loosely based on the life of Emily Brontë, the author of Wuthering Heights. The work opens in 1847, with a villager laying out the body of Eliza May Drayden, who, like Brontë, has written a book widely derided at the time it was published but would go on to become a classic. The opening scene is tinged with the Gothic horror of Wuthering Heights, Drayden’s eyes refuse to close for her burial. The next 650 pages follow 11 interconnect stories that orbit around Drayden, and her sister Millicent, the fictionalised Charlotte Brontë who authored of Jane Eyre. Similar again to Wuthering Heights, all are largely set on the moors in England, though the final story takes the reader to the Daanje’s hometown of Groningen. Rather than a traditional narrative, the book is written like an expansive biography, incorporating news articles, excerpts from diaries, letters, citations from fictional biographies and even parts of Drayden’s novel. Each of the tales could be novellas in their own right, vivid and sometimes nail-biting, sending the reader off on tangents such as the mistreatment of two half-German sisters during the Second World War, or a pair of French half-sisters whose shared father creates a wedge between them. The nature of sisterhood and the relationship between various female characters is one of the central themes of The Song of Stork and Dromedary. The work also reflects on the status of women at different times across the novel’s 200-year span. Death is another important theme. Drayden’s death, with which the book opens, is an event that brings characters together but also tears them apart. [...] The Song of Stork and Dromedary took home both the Boekenbon Literature Prize and the Libris Literature Prize, the first book to ever net both awards. It was named the Best Book of the Century by the NRC newspaper. The English translation was published this year. In 2023, Daanje was awarded the Constantijn Huygens Prize for her oeuvre. The book was translated by David McKay, who also translated War and Turpentine by Stefan Hertmans and Multatuli’s Max Havelaar. He renders the complicated work thoughtfully, retaining Daanje’s character. The Song of Stork and Dromedary is compelling and brilliant, and the author is worthy of the highest honour in literature. (Molly Quell)
Country & Town House lists '10 Of The Best Period Dramas To Stream Now On BBC iPlayer,' and one of them is Jane Eyre (2006) Few novels have done more for the gothic imagination than Brontë’s Jane Eyre. The 2006 adaptation leans into all the familiar pleasures of Brontë’s world, from a remote country house, its brooding master and coincidentally love interest and a dark past hidden behind closed doors. Ruth Wilson brings a sharp intelligence to Jane, while Toby Stephens gives Rochester enough danger to keep their romance from becoming too comfortable. Dark and emotionally charged, this is a Jane Eyre that understands the gothic works best. (Naina Zilbermints)
After a windier road than expected, Paramount and Warner are now one, under the banner of Skydance, and the film industry is set for a shake-up [...] That’s where executives like the departed De Luca and Abdy would have come in handy. Their tenure at Warner was characterized by both risks and variety befitting one of Hollywood’s most recognizable and prestigious movie studios. They greenlit two beloved smash-hit horror movies with Sinners and Weapons. The studio won a best picture Oscar – their first in over a decade – with Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another. They let indie talents play in a big-studio sandbox with movies like Wuthering Heights and The End of Oak Street. Even their franchise films, like the Dune sequels, Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, and Superman had the clear creative imprint of individual creators. (Jesse Hassenger)
Your favourite literary character? Jane Eyre because she insists the world doesn’t belong to the rich, beautiful and well connected: “Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain, and little, I am soulless and heartless?” She reverses traditional gender roles and ends up rescuing Mr Rochester (I’d have left him to fester).
A contributor to The Bull & Bear reminisces about going to see Wuthering Heights 2026 on Valentine's Day (spoiler alert: she didn't like it). A contributor to Inside Times reports that Wuthering Heights has been banned--along with other classic novels--from prison.
More Recent Articles
|
