Church Times reviews Underdog: The Other Other Brontë. In part, this piece seeks to rehabilitate Anne from the shadow of her sisters, Charlotte and Emily. On the whole, it does this, although little is known about Anne, and much of her posthumous ...
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

Click here to read this mailing online.

Your email updates, powered by FeedBlitz

 
Here is a sample subscription for you. Click here to start your FREE subscription


"BrontëBlog" - 5 new articles

  1. Is Charlotte the problem?
  2. Structuralism
  3. By all accounts the inaugural Banagher Brontë Festival was a huge success
  4. Existential Windows
  5. Letters, spin-offs and turbulent pasts
  6. More Recent Articles

Is Charlotte the problem?

Church Times reviews Underdog: The Other Other Brontë.
In part, this piece seeks to rehabilitate Anne from the shadow of her sisters, Charlotte and Emily. On the whole, it does this, although little is known about Anne, and much of her posthumous reputation was controlled by the dominant and surviving Charlotte. All three sisters wrote their first novel at the same time in the intense atmosphere of the parsonage at Haworth, their childhood home. They had plundered their father’s domestic library and imbibed deeply of the surrounding Yorkshire moors. The 1846 drafts by Anne and Emily were immediately accepted; Charlotte’s was rejected.
Two twists emerge. The first is the competition between the sisters, and Gemma Whelan’s feisty portrayal of Charlotte is the least sympathetic. She begins the show, wandering through the stalls in a flame-red dress, hectoring the audience in flat vowels with questions over their favourite Brontë novel. One chap got sat on. She is the colossus — of both this play and the Brontë legacy. What follows tries to unpick that somewhat.
The second twist is that, at first, the sisters were published under a male pseudonym as the Bell brothers. Brontë loyalists will know this, but not everyone. Although they were unmasked, and their real identity became known, it was as much to do — so this play says — with Charlotte’s wanting due recognition for her own work. Publishing was a male-dominated world, and the sisters were something of a novelty. Sadly, their early deaths ended arguably one of the brightest of family talents in the Victorian era. The battle-of-the-sexes thing is a little clumsily done, yet also amusing. There’s a knowingness to this play. “We may have died young, but we still have an amazing reputation,” the sisters seem to say.
The problem is Charlotte. Whelan plays her convincingly as gobby and domineering, and a domestic bully. At times, the vulnerability and fragility emerge, but rarely. Adele James’s sweet, floaty Emily is a lot more appealing, as is the gentle Anne of Rhiannon Clements. They are much nicer and not developed enough; how could they be, given that it’s the Charlotte Show and they both expired so soon? Unforgivably, Charlotte suppressed Anne’s Wildfell Hall after her death; the limelight had to be hers alone.
The supporting cast are all men (nothing gender-blind here) and match up energetically. James Phoon plays the useless drunkard-brother, Branwell. Adam Donaldson and Kwaku Mills join Nick Blakely with comical results: one moment, a stagecoach complete with clopping horse; another, nasty patrician publishers in hats and coats with cigars. Blakely is a particular highlight in skirt roles such as Mrs Ingham of Mirfield, who brings Anne in as a governess, and then Elizabeth Gaskell, who wrote the first biography of Charlotte, but didn’t seem to get it.
Everything is beautifully staged in Fran Miller’s production. Natalie Ibu’s witty direction brings a great deal of fun, including a gentlemen’s club turning into a nightclub. Grace Smart’s set and costumes are striking, with Zoe Spurr’s lights creating much intimacy and ambience. But it is difficult to know for whom this piece is intended. It is probably not for literary buffs; and the sight of women oppressing other women feels counter-narrative, which could be the point after all. (Simon Walsh)
The Globe and Mail reviews Gothic Canadian drama The King Tide.
I first saw The King Tide last September at the Toronto International Film Festival, and it’s haunted me ever since. The rugged Newfoundland landscapes (shot in and around the microscopic outport of Keels), the vibrant cinematography and hypnotic score, the gothic-tinged story – a baby with mysterious powers washes ashore a remote island fishing village – combine to create a film both timeless and out of time. It’s written and directed by contemporary Canadians – Albert Shin and Christian Sparkes, respectively – but could have been conceived, equally plausibly, by Charlotte Bronte, Daphne du Maurier or Stephen King. (Johanna Schneller)
A contributor to The Stanford Daily writes about her former roommate.
In my “Dear roommate” essay to get into Stanford, I asked you about your pet preferences and listed all the pets that I’ve owned (everything except for a cat and dog). I now know that you like slightly fucked-up looking chihuahuas and your favorite birds are crows. I also told you that my shelves were going to be full of books that I haven’t read (still very true), but now they contain books that you’ve gifted me: a beautiful copy of “Wuthering Heights” and a lesser-known Murakami. I warned you about my massive soundtrack playlist that I use to study, now even longer after we’ve watched so many movies and TV shows together. (Emma Kexin Wang)
   

Structuralism

A new Brontë-related paper:
Structuralism In Jane Eyre: Interaction Of Binary Oppositions In Buildungsroman
CEMJP, 32(1), 83–91

This paper explores Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë via a structuralist perspective, paying special attention to the idea of binary oppositions and how they help Jane navigate the constraints of Victorian society and develop her identity. By carefully dissecting these conflicting components that keep coming up, the study seeks to reveal the societal commentary that is subtly present in the story.
The study will break down the novel's key binary oppositions. These contrast the desire for freedom (Lowood/Moor House) with the actual confining areas (Gateshead/Thornfield). We will examine how these disparate environments symbolize the social and physical restrictions that women face. The dichotomy of agency connected with the masculine domain and passivity associated with the feminine sphere will also be analyzed in light of Jane's interactions with Mrs. Reed and Mr. Rochester, among other characters. Here, we shall witness Jane's brilliance, tenacity, and steadfast spirit as she defies these accepted standards.
The relevance of recurrent motifs and symbols within the narrative framework will also be covered in this session. For example, the investigation of fire and light will be examined as metaphors for Jane's own emerging self-reliance and curiosity. This symbolism will be contrasted with the darkness and entrapment symbolized by confining spaces like Gateshead, where Mrs. Reed embodies the oppressive nature of Victorian expectations.
Utilizing a structuralist methodology, the essay will contend that Jane Eyre is more than just a tale of coming-of-age. It develops into a powerful indictment of women's limitations and Victorian societal conventions. The story promotes the search of self-discovery and individual autonomy, especially in the face of oppressive society limits, via Jane's unrelenting defiance of the established binaries. This disobedience becomes a challenge to the fundamentals of a constrictive social structure rather than just a personal conflict.
In addition to examining how these binary choices affect Jane, the study will also look at how they influence the story as a whole. The recurring pattern of Jane's experiences—from imprisonment to a brief moment of optimism, then back to another setback—can be interpreted as a mirror of the cyclical nature of the social norms that she consistently challenges.
In the end, the essay will make the case that reading Jane Eyre via a structuralist lens reveals a nuanced and intricate story. It is a story of personal growth intertwined with a powerful social commentary, all masterfully woven through the utilization of binary oppositions and symbolic motifs.
   

By all accounts the inaugural Banagher Brontë Festival was a huge success

Offaly Live reports that the first ever Banagher Brontë Festival was a great success.
By all accounts the inaugural Banagher Brontë Festival held last weekend to celebrate Charlotte Brontë’s birthday, was a huge success.
Proceedings opened on Friday evening with a première of 'An Evening with Charlotte Brontë' devised specifically for the Banagher Brontë Group by Michael O’Dowd and his wife Christine. Michael is the author of Charlotte Brontë An Irish Odyssey, an historical account of Charlotte’s honeymoon in Dublin, Banagher, Kilkee and Killarney with her Banagher-reared husband Arthur Bell Nicholls.
The presentation focussed on the poetry, songs and music beloved of the Brontë family particularly the melodies of Thomas Moore and poems and ballads of Robbie Burns. The narrative and music were exquisitely presented drawing much appreciation and participation from the large attendance. The event was held in Corrigan’s Back Lounge which was beautifully decorated and appointed for the gala occasion.
All events on Saturday were held in Crank House starting with Joanne Wilcock’s talk called 'Falling in Love with Arthur'. Joanne explored the different opinions and feelings people had regarding Arthur Bell Nicholls. Speaking in great detail she explained how the negative opinions relating to Arthur gradually changed particularly in the cases of his father-in-law Patrick Brontë and Martha Brown, the lifelong servant at the Brontë parsonage.
Initially, in 1852, Patrick had violently opposed Arthur’s marriage proposal to Charlotte but he gradually acquiesced and they were married in 1854. Seven years later in his will he bequeathed the vast majority of his estate to ‘My beloved and esteemed son-in-law The Rev. Arthur Bell Nicholls, B.A.’
Martha’s early hostility to Arthur mellowed to respect and affection, accompanying him when he returned to Banagher in 1861 and making numerous long-term return visits before her death in 1880. Surviving correspondence between them show Arthur in an avuncular role advising Martha on her romantic and financial affairs.
Pauline Clooney then presented 'Currer Bell's Silent Years 1852-1855', an examination of Charlotte’s paths to publication and her attitude to a writing life. Making great use of her letters to prospective publishers she illustrated how the Brontë sisters overcame many patriarchal obstacles before eventually achieving the goal of publication.
With the huge success of Jane Eyre and the welcome finances that accrued her writing business affairs become better managed. As to the relative lack of output between 1852 and 1855 Pauline posited that the crippling loneliness she endured after Branwell, Emily and Anne died within nine month between autumn 1848 and summer 1849, stifled her creativity. They had not just been her close siblings but more vitally the lifelong collaborators of her writings.
Finally she disapproved of the notion found in some biographies that Arthur had curbed her writing after their marriage in 1854. Evidence shows that far from being so that he had encouraged her in her last work, Emma, which unfortunately remained unfinished before her death in March 1855.
After lunch, at 2.30 p.m Maebh O’Regan presented 'The Art of Branwell Brontë'. Branwell showed great promise as a portrait artist but he felt his true vocation was in literary composition. Maebh spoke of the artists that had trained the Brontë children and how Branwell had been singled out for special tuition which enabled him to become a portrait artist of note.
This was followed by two short films 'The Early Days of the BBG', a short film by created by Maebh and Seanie O’Regan, (Táin Bó Productions), capturing some historic (and otherwise) moments of the early days of the Banagher Brontë Group and some important footage on the group’s participation in the local Patrick’s day parade and a recent trip to Haworth and other parts of Yorkshire.
The day’s events concluded with a short amble from Crank House up the Main Street to view the various works of art and displays in local shop windows which have been created by local artists Phil Bennet and Lisa Glynn finishing with a close look at Sheila Hough’s marvellous portraits in Johnny Hough’s musical pub.
The festival concluded on Sunday morning with a short walk from Saint Paul’s Church on the Hill to Cuba to look at the remains of the Royal School of Banagher. Members then attended service where they were given a warm welcome by the Saint Paul’s Church community.
Matters drew to a close with coffees and teas in Nicola Daly’s guest house, Charlotte’s Way, where a specially prepared Brontë cake was served in honour of Charlotte’s 208th birthday. The essential ingredient of Brontë cake is crushed pistachios.
Houston Chonicle reviews Alley Theatre's Jane Eyre.
“Jane Eyre” is not the novel she used to be. She’s grown over the years with the barnacle-like accumulation of theories and readings that have expanded plain “Jane” into an obese compendium of interpretations including everything from its place in the evolving literary tradition of the novel to its radical feminism and Marxist and psychological elements — not to mention its Gothicism and the summaries of generations of students spanning from high school AP courses to college seniors. It’s exhausting to think about it — much less write the sentence!
Still, the image is relevant in light of the Alley Theatre’s current production of “Jane Eyre” adapted for the stage by Elizabeth Williamson. For though its basic plot and characters are extracted from Charlotte Brontë’s 1847 novel (originally subtitled, in typical 19th century indirection, as “An Autobiography”), it has to decide which of the many interpretations of Brontë will step on stage for the audience. [...]
This production loads up with an entrée of romance supported by sides of Gothic mystery and humorous takes on the novel’s gravy boat of coincidences and quaint values — all thoroughly digestible.
If such a description has an air of condescension, know, dear reader (as Jane might say), that none is intended. For to pull off such a feat requires clear, brave decisions on the part of the script and the production, beginning with opting to maintain the novel’s first-person narration: Jane speaks directly to the audience and evokes key dramatized scenes. To do this, director Eleanor Holdridge cedes the front of the stage to Melissa Molano’s Jane, relying on the symbol of Jane’s writing desk to define the space while using the majority of the stage to stand in as the large house of Jane’s employer, Edward Rochester. Aptly named Thornfield Hall, scenic designer John Coyne has created a space that has spiraling beauty and simplicity as well as sliding surfaces concealing mysteries and horrors.
More importantly, the production has found in Molano an actress capable and willing to create a performance that matches the set, and, for that matter, her exquisite costume designed by Valérie Thérèse Bart, that is flowing and complicated enough to suggest Victorian fashion but simple enough to represent Jane’s social status and to facilitate removal and putting on to show shifts in times of day. It is a performance that appears as seamless as the dress.
As Rochester, Chris Hutchison offers a clear foil to Molano’s Jane. Often seen as the brooding but manly hero, Hutchison’s Rochester is more mercurial. Beyond his wealth, he offers little in terms of traditional romantic attraction. Indeed, the audience first meets him falling onto the stage from his unseen horse and suffering from a twisted ankle more in line with troubles given to novels’ females. But as the play progresses, Hutchison lets Rochester’s flaws and quirks prepare us for his need for Jane and the play’s traditional happy ending even as they enable the Gothic mysteries centered on a largely unseen madwoman in the attic take on added thrills.
The large list of supporting characters is handled by actors playing multiple roles, with Susan Koozin’s Mrs. Fairfax, the housekeeper, and Lady Ingram, a visiting aristocrat hoping to trap Rochester’s money for her daughter, being especially enjoyable. Especially in her early scenes, she gives the production a depth it would otherwise struggle to find.
In short, neither Williamson’s script or the Alley’s production manage to plunge all the depths that Brontë’s novel has delivered to close readers for generations, but it is a delightful entertainment and an encouragement for audiences teased by this “Jane” to pick up the “Jane” residing in the novel’s pages. And even if no one accepts that prod, the Alley’s “Jane Eyre” insures that Brontë’s characters continue to breathe and entice even as it suggests ways the theatre and the printed page can have a healthy relationship. (Robert Donahoo)
A contributor to Worldcrunch wonders 'Why We Don't Let Stories End Anymore' meaning there are endless sequels, prequels and spin.offs of the stories we love.
The great American science fiction writer Ray Bradbury was enraptured, asking us to imagine our favorite novels by Kipling, Dickens, Wilde, Shaw or Poe brought back to life 30 years from now. What unintended changes would they undergo? Would Poe's Usher collapse only to rise again? Would The Great Gatsby do 20 laps around the pool? Would Cathy of Wuthering Heights rush to Heathcliff's cry from under the snow? (Loredana Lipperini)
   

Existential Windows

A new scholarly paper just published:
Sarah H. Lognion, McNeese State Universit
Butler Journal of Undergraduate Research Butler Journal, Vol 10, 2024

This paper explores the existential theme of authenticity in two literary works, Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights and Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, through the lens of Albert Camus’s philosophy as presented in The Myth of Sisyphus. The analysis focuses on the characters’ struggles to carve out meaningful existences, the symbolism of closed-in structures and the absurd, and failed attempts at rationalization. Through a literary exploration, this paper aims to acknowledge existential dilemmas presented in Brontë’s and Kafka’s works and the importance of recognizing the absurdity of life.

   

Letters, spin-offs and turbulent pasts

A contributor to Financial Times writes about reading famous authors' letters.
I’m all for Madame Constantin Héger’s approach. She discovered that Charlotte Brontë was in love with her husband after finding a few of the novelist’s letters to him torn up in the bin. Ever resourceful, she stitched them back together, leaving for posterity a record of 29-year-old Brontë at her passionate, obsessive best: “Day and night I find neither rest nor peace — if I sleep I have tormenting dreams in which I see you always severe, always saturnine and angry with me . . .” (Nilanjana Roy)
The Times has selected 'eight great literary spin-offs' and one of them is
Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys (1966)
Ever wondered about the first Mrs Rochester from Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre? Wonder no more. Dominican-born Jean Rhys gave a voice to the “mad” Creole heiress, Antoinette Cosway, that Mr Rochester locked up in the attic. The story is told in the voices of Antoinette (“There is no looking-glass here and I don’t know what I am like now”) and Mr Rochester (“Here is the secret. Here”). It was published when Rhys was 76 after decades of silence (her early novels are terrific too), when many people thought she was already dead. Her cynical view on her renaissance? “It has come too late.” (John Self)
Elle features author Amy Tan in its Shelf Life series and asks her about the book
...I’ve re-read the most:
Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë, because each time I re-read this story of a lonely young girl coming of age, I revisit my turbulent past at a similar age and gain new perceptions about my evolving self. (Riza Cruz)
Today we get another reference to the 'invisible string' in Jane Eyre. From PopSugar:
According to [registered psychotherapist Eloise] Skinner, the enduring popularity of the concept of invisible strings is not a recent phenomenon, even if it's recently popped off on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. It draws from a range of influences, spanning philosophy, physics, and East Asian folklore. This idea of the "invisible string" nods to the ancient belief in the red thread of fate, which connects two souls destined to be together.
Charlotte Brontë beautifully captures this notion in the novel "Jane Eyre," describing it as a string tightly knotted under the left ribs, bound to another similar string. (Morgan Sullivan)
Click2Houston has a video showing what goes one behind the scenes of Alley Theatre's Jane Eyre production. News 18 lists the '8 most romantic reads of all time' including Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre. News 18 also lists '7 timeles novels that one must read' including both Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre as well. Times Now News lists '12 houses of famous authors open for visitors' including the Brontë Parsonage Museum.
   

More Recent Articles


You Might Like