A mid-career NYC HS Teacher:This proposal is fucked. This is insane. Mulgrew wants to take our health plan, totally deregulate it, and. hand huge chunks of it over to the worst actor (United Healthcare) in the entire industry. I read through that FAQ ...
This proposal is fucked. This is insane. Mulgrew wants to take our health plan, totally deregulate it, and
hand huge chunks of it over to the worst actor (United Healthcare) in the entire industry.
I read through that FAQ with a very
qualified expert (who is not in a position to put their name out
publicly). They are of the same opinion. Very, VERy bad idea.
The self-insured plan would not be subject to
regulation from NY State Insurance Commissioner (Department of
Financial Services). Nor would it be subject to Federal ERISA rules.
The alarm bells need to be ringing. We are sleep walking into a huge set up.
NY State DFS is one of the most powerful regulators in the country
(next to California). We should most definitely not remove our plan
from their oversight.
If you have a vote, you need to vote no. Start making some noise on
this. I am telling you it is time to wake up and get LOUD!
I don’t know what else to say to motivate people. People are sleepwalking like confused robots into very bad situation.
Like lambs to the slaughter.
UFT Retiree, ABC candidate for Ex Bd. :
I am a retiree and I was lied to about my healthcare. I will never
again believe what Unity has to sell me. This is the “little boy who
cried WOLF” syndrome. The way I see this we should all be voting NO on
proposed city healthcare until we are given the contract and adequate
time to read/digest it. I certainly could not approve of something that I
have not read/researched....
HS teacher: Happy school year 2025-26! Our members are already expressing concern about United health care's terrible record when it comes to pre-authorizations and denial of claims.
Is this something we need to be concerned about ?
comment on chat:RA And NAC’s delegates have to show some spine. Someone needs to rally the half of the RTC delegates not caucus bound. The 300 delegates in RTC should be demanding answers. ....
Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2025
I know this after decades of watching Unity Caucus leadership of the UFT operate: LOOK PAST THE SALES JOB AND BE SUSPICIOUS and OPPOSE even not knowing the details because there will be things you are not being told. I will be posting some more details on reasons to say NO in the next few days. But here is some history of where we are today. And let's point out -- the new healthcare plan affects working members and retirees not on medicare (under 65).
As people examine the proposed changes in healthcare, after a sense of initial acceptance by some associated with the opposition, there is a growing sense of opposition. While not public, I'm proud to say that on internal ABC chats there was immediate push back and analysis of the flaws in the plan, while the rest of the non-Unity world seemed to be in the dark, with all members of the healthcare committee, including reps from non-Unity caucuses, actually voting to agree, which, given their experience with Unity, they bought the bill of goods at the Aug. 28th Mulgrew presentation - the equivalent of a used car salesman. (I'm bringing the Brooklyn Bridge to hawk at the next meeting.)
ABC has also been doing internal analysis with some ABC affiliated people raising public issues since the first days of the plan.
NAC co-leader and ARISE steering committee member Nick Bacon (congrats on the new baby) made his usual attack on ABC people who raised questions about the healthcare plan and branding them as seeing things through "conspiracy colored glasses" and promoted the more cautious NAC approach.
Well, get me more pairs of those glasses. Would he brand fellow ARISE member MORE's call for a NO Votes the same way and threaten the bonds formed in the ARISE alliance? In this situation MORE and ABC seem to be more in synch.
While ABC has not put out a formal position, the ABC chats were rife with criticisms immediately after some details of the Mulgrew-led Aug. 28 healthcare committee meeting, focusing on the self-funding issue (see below), hospital tiers and other issues that my brain is too simple to absorb.
In my internal debates with RA/RTC leaders I have pulled whatever hair I have left over their sense of "We can't automatically oppose anything Unity proposes, Unity is not the enemy but fellow unionists." My response has been - you mean the very people who tried to sell retirees on how great a Medicare Adv would be -- twice - until they lost the big RTC election? And you are giving them a benefit of the doubt an yet another healthcare plan being presented as saving the city money? With United fucking Health yet? And how about that 60 year reign with the current edition holding 100% of elected position despite getting only 54% of the vote, a state of disunion?
I say automatically oppose anything this big they propose. I don't even need to see any stinkn details to smell a rat - especially when they say they are both saving the city money and giving us a better healthcare plan.
Where do I begin to talk about the brand new healthcare proposal which will be voted on at the special Sept. 29 Delegate Assembly. Maybe at the beginning.
Way back then -- at a DA last fall or winter (excuse the memory issue - I was in the midst of chemo) - the newly empowered Retired Teacher Chapter, for the first time no longer controlled by Unity Caucus, passed a resolution calling for a vote by the Delegate Assembly for any changes in healthcare.
Now understand, this was occurring in the midst of a UFT election campaign where there was a growing differential between the newly emerging A Better Contract and the ARISE coalition of 3 legacy caucuses comprising New Action, MORE and Retiree Advocate. The latter had won the June 2024 RTC chapter election and elected the entire 10 officer, 15 exec bd and 300 delegates. MORE claimed to have 100 chapter leaders and delegates and New Action had a few. ABC, still in formation, had no clear number of delegates and chapter leaders at that point, but had a bunch. If they all packed the DA, there was potential to exert an unprecedented level of control over the DA.
It didn't happen.
What began the year as a nervous Unity, turned into more and more dominance as the opposition seemed to fade away. At that point, Unity was still figuring things out and decided to support the reso from RTC on the DA voting for any healthcare changes.
UFT Secretary LeRoy Barr amended the reso to declare the UFT would never advocate for MediCare Adv - the leadership response to the RTC election loss - to many of us words only because they would oppose city council bill 1096 which would codify protections for retirees.
And then Mike Sill, part of the 3 man triumvirate, added another amendment calling for the creation of a UFT Healthcare Committee that turned out to be totally controlled by the leadership. Some say hand-picked, including some members of RA and New Action - it is not clear if any from MORE joined the committee -- but one thing was clear - anyone associated with ABC who tried to join was rejected.
I want to point out that some of us associated with ABC were not happy with a reso calling for the DA, controlled by Unity, to vote on healthcare changes since a few of us had put out a petition back in April-June 2023 calling for the entire membership to vote on healthcare changes, a petition that garnered over 12,000 signatures of in-service and retirees. (Yes, we dropped the ball in not continuing with it in the 23-24 school year.
The late James Eterno was instrumental in formulating the petition which
needed 10% of the membership (20K) to sign to force a referendum. James' stroke and total incapacity affected us so deeply, the momentum was lost on the petition and we never reached 20k but it was clear we had a shot at it.
This was one of James' final posts on the ICE blog on April 18, 2023:
We can convince 10 percent of UFTers to sign our petition so we can get a full membership vote on significant changes to our healthcare if everyone climbs on board the petition express.
At that point we had 400 sigs. Over the next 8 weeks it grew to over 12K: James and I posted progress on our blogs:
The abandonment by the RTC leadership of the call for a member referendum and lodging the vote in the DA was viewed as a betrayal of sorts, given that the original reso from 2023 had a chance of passing this DA, if RA and MORE had gotten most of their delegates to show up and actually coordinated with each other- which they did not do, which is surprising given they were allied in the election as ARISE. (At no point through the 6-month election process did we see signs of the ARISE delegates from all 3 groups working together at the DA, except for a few rare moments.) At that point ABC had. not yet consolidated a delegate group to act at the DA except in a few instances.
The chickens of that decision to make the DA and not the membership vote will come home to roost when a Unity controlled DA is favored to pass the new healthcare plan at the special Sept. 29 DA.
That abandonment was a sign of weakness in the RTC leadership -- a fear and failure to confront the leadership when it should have capitalized on the strength of having won 63% of the RTC vote in June, 2024. I and other retirees have been increasingly frustrated by a sense that the RTC leadership values being civil and seeking bipartisanship over confronting the leadership. Arthur and I are part of that leadership but have disagreed with that direction.
On August 28, Mulgrew called a healthcare committee meeting. RTC Bennett Fischer, who was in Maine on vacation and also recovering from a serious operation, had scheduled a remote RTC Exec Bd meeting, postponed it so 4 RTC officers who are all on the Retiree Advocate Organizing committee and ran on the ARISE slate, could attend the healthcare meeting.
What was clear to many of us who have dealt with the Unity machine over decades was that this would be a selling job, not a fair presentation. They needed to go into that meeting prepared to say no or at least abstain.
Mulgrew announced after the meeting there was a unanimous vote to support the new agreement, news that astonished me and others. I emailed the RA Organizers listserve and asked if the 4 attendees had voted for the plan but received no response. One member told me that there was a lot of confusion and no formal vote but that Mulgrew ended the meeting by saying "if there are no objections." At the next RA meeting I asked again and heard a variety of responses, but also a sense that Mulgrew's selling job worked on the whole. Our reps told us they did raise questions but without an independent analysis, had no way of knowing what the flaws were. As I said -- they should have said no and not let Mulgrew claim bipartisan unanimous support as part of his selling job to the DA and members.
What I did see on ABC chats was an immediate reaction questioning many aspects of the plan. I mean immediate.
The New Plan is self-funded - a major flaw according to the ABC crew - as per the opening comment, does self-funding remove state protections?
In a self-funded ERISA-governed plan, New York state mandates—including protections for gender-affirming care, fertility treatments, and mental health parity are not automatically enforceable, unless federal law requires it.
Here are some notes from the ABC chat:
But aren’t they legally required to provide coverage like gender-affirming care in NY State?
Legally, yes. However, one of the loopholes United Healthcare has is that under the new plan, it will be self-funded, which means you cannot appeal externally to New York State if you are denied coverage, which is an important tool for many members of our communities who are denied care. This doesn’t just apply for gender-affirming care, but cancer treatments and other life-saving treatments as well. If you wish to receive care outside of the Downstate 13, you are essentially at the mercy of United’s system. Union leaders will respond that Emblem is administering parts of the plan.
The have to follow the law they don’t have to cover any explicitly NYS health mandates
Per Marianne they could follow idahos state regulations on coverage if they choose to.
This is a major issue. The oversight is very loosely goosey on self funded plans
Especially for left leaning states healthcare mandates
This self funding is the primary reason to vote NO
Yes absolutely
Yes the STRIKE HOT (MORE) post simply mentioned it’s self funded. Unless that’s explained how that works and why it could easily collapse the system, most will NOT have any clue what that means.
I’ve spoken to a lot of cl and delegate teachers in Staten Island who have staff who want this because they live in NJ and emblem was garbage there for years. So this is an improvement to them.
Selling
point 1 is that they claim there are 50% less preauthorizations. This
conflates preauthorizations with denials. They are not the same … and no
matter who has more or less preauthorizations… United healthcare’s
percentage is still 1 out 3. Even if I drive in less traffic every day,
follow all traffic rules and don’t putz around in strip mall parking
lots … if my accident rate is still 1 out of 3 … it’s still a fkn
nightmare
Selling
point 2 … they say “medical claims” will be handled by Emblem’s new
downtstate 13 plan. First we don’t know it to be true since we don’t
have a contract to analyze. Emblem’s plan never handled hospital care
before. And is medical claims same as hospital claims?
Nj, ct, and everyone else is ruled by united
United is covering outside the downstate 13
Hospital is health and hospital then tier 2 is a crapshoot
One of the biggest disadvantages of self-funded insurance plans is cost uncertainty.
Variable Costs and Unpredictable Expenses
Unlike fully-insured plans with fixed premiums, self-funded plans
have variable costs. This means the amount you pay depends on the actual
medical claims of your employees. One month, you might pay very little,
but the next month, you could face multiple high-cost claims. This
unpredictability can make it hard to plan and budget for healthcare
expenses.
“In a self-funded plan, budgeting becomes extremely important,” says
Les Perlson, a veteran in the health insurance industry. “You need to
anticipate the number and amount of claims you may receive.”
Budgeting Challenges
Planning for healthcare costs year over year can be stressful.
Self-funded plans require careful budgeting based on employee
demographics such as age, region, and the number of dependents. It’s
crucial to have sufficient reserves and risk mitigation strategies like
stop-loss insurance to manage potential financial risks.
I'm heading over to 52 for my first drawing class at Sy Beagle classes. I have a drawing/painting class on Thursdays. I have no talent at all so expect scribbles. But one day I want to draw or paint parts of my garden.
Bennett Fischer and RTC banner
The crowd on Saturday at the parade was mostly Unity with the non-Unity groups from various caucuses. Retirees had a nice group and I saw some people from MORE and Educators for Mamdani. Everyone is very friendly on this day - a sense of union unity (small u).
One thing I noticed later on when I watched other unions. Many had signs with elements of class struggle - against billionaires, bosses, etc. (see some pics I took below -- burly teamsters smoking stogies). I note that in the UFT you do not see those types of signs. We saw fight fascism signs but not fight billionaires. I think that stems from UFT historic anti-left ideology (I know, they endorsed Mamdani, but that is only because he looked like a clear winner -- like they endorsed Adams last time because he looked like a winner - and never forget the Mulgrew/Adams alliance to take away our Medicare.
Watching the fervor of many unions, the UFT crew looked passive.
I never saw Mamdani or Bernie, who both appeared at Brooklyn College that evening. I wanted to attend but the logistics of doing that were too complex. I marched with the UFT uptown and ran into a number of people I knew from throughout the union.
After we got past the viewing stand, I
walked back down and watched and took
photos of the later unions marching. So I missed the ones that left
before us. But I headed back to 48th St to hopefully march with Marianne
and the NYC Retirees on their amazing SI ferry float. (Note for Mamdani critics of his free buses - SI ferry is free)
I got there and they still
hadn't left yet and the weather was turning ominous and my knee ached
so I couldn't wait around to march with them but took some pics. I walked back to my apartment on 38th and reached Grand Central with it started to rain buckets - even with my umbrella I got soaked.
A new feature in these bleak times -
Jokes of the day:
I had walked uptown with one of my faves over the years, great CL for years, Yelena S., who worked with our ICE-UFT crew since 2005, who was just fired by
the Mulgrew crowd.
Yelena
has worked as a part-timer for the union for over a decade back to
before she retired and always ran with us against Unity, including as
elementary VP. But until she ran with ABC they did not seem to have a
problem with her. By the way, Yelena wanted to run with both ABC and
ARISE but an RA's and ARISE steering committee member forced her to
choose and she chose ABC because she felt they had a better chance to
win with Amy running. She was right. We clearly had a better chance. For
months I had proposed that we run some joint candidates but that same
person told people the reason we wanted joint was because we could not fill our slate (ABC got 560 candidates, ARISE 490).
That was
what he kept selling the ARISE people - at one point saying ABC was only
7 people and would have to come back to ARISE. When people ask why ABC and ARISE did not work together, look no further.
Yelena and I had a great talk as we walked and found our views dovetailed on the type of group we feel ABC could be -- more open to all types of views even those we may not agree with. One of her daughters owns a book store in Brooklyn and I have to post the name as my memory is a bit faulty.
Political Point of the Day: I am a political junky and have these thoughts but never get to post them so I will use this space. Today on the potential Govt shutdown, which I hear people pushing Dems to do, as if Trump would actually follow the law. So here is my prediction. Dems show some guts and shut down the govt and Trump says fuck you and doesn't do it and the Supreme Court backs him. Fundamentally, Congress is dead -- we've had our virtual Reichstag fire as Congress has been burned down.
Here are some of my recent posts -- which have been getting some traction. I have to leave now to catch the ferry -- the best thing to happen to NYC transportation since the IRT. And for de Blasio blasters I cite the ferry and pre-k as significant.
ABC supporters and acquaintances purged. Unity purge continues with more firings of those who ran with ABC or were seen as being too friendly. We learned of 2 more firings over the past few days, one was a Unity Caucus member and one was one of the few people who always ran with the oppo who kept a part-time job at the UFT despite that but apparently running with ABC was too much.
Friday, Sept. 5, 2025
I'm taking the 8 AM ferry tomorrow morning into the city for the Labor Day parade. The UFT contingent takes off around 11 and I will march with them and circle back to march with the NYC Retirees at 1:30. The Retiree UFT Chapter will be focused on fighting fascism. I don't agree that should be the focus because it is so much virtue signaling. As one CL said: Trump must be trembling.
Also marching will be a contingent of supporters of Ashley Rzonca, fired district rep from District 30 and I will march with them as I think the fight against fascism starts with Mulgrew and his Unity gang.
I see that revolt as the first potential super serious break in Unity control in its 60-year history of control. At a recent meeting where battling Trump fascism was discussed - watch the signs at the parade- I pointed out that when one political entity controls the largest union local in the nation for 60 years - and in the recent election where Unity got 54% of the vote but gets 100% of the officers, Exec Bd and AFT/NYSUT Delegates - well I call that fascism.
On Thursday, 20 people gathered at UFT HQ to make "Fight Fascism" signs for Saturday's Labor Day march while they will march with the Unity Caucus Fascists who lead our union. These are the same people who attack Marianne Pizzitola for being an authoritarian. Speaking of which,
I did attend the Happy 65th Birthday event at City Hall on Tuesday with Marianne's NYC Retirees to promote law 1096, opposed by our own union leaders who are more focused on saving the city money than saving our healthcare.
The event supporting 1096 was very light hearted and fun. it was good to see some of my Retiree Advocates colleagues there with the RTC banner.
Afterwards I went to lunch with an academic doing research on the UFT. I may earn a citation when the best-selling book comes out one day. And think of the movie rights. Who will play Mulgrew and Randi?
Chris Marte, whose politics probably echo Mamdani, and who has been our champion on 1096, has thrown his hat into the ring for City Council speaker and promises an independent council, which should be interesting if both he and Mamdani win.
I've had some interesting conversations with some people associated with the ARISE caucus crowd, consisting of MORE, NAC and RA.
I spent a great day with MORE/ARISE officer candidate Jessica Beck who led me on a bird watching expedition at Jamaica Wildlife preserve and I led her on a tour of my garden, Breezy Point, and we spent some time at Fort Tilden beach which, in the late afternoon, was empty and wonderful. Jessica introduced me to this oyster catcher and pointed to all the flying birds with fish in their claws or mouths. It was not all about da birds. We also had some deep talks about the union, the election and general politics, not always agreeing, but always respectful. Jessica is one of the people capable of bringing people together.
Some conversations with others connected to ARISE have not gone as well. There's a strong sense of self-righteousness based on their supposed willingness to take on controversial political issues - but not necessarily the Israel issue - unless it was with a front group. Some attack ABC for not taking on Trump as a way to attract Trump supporters in the election. ABC put out a survey before the election on issues of most concern and the Trump issue was nowhere to be found. My response is if you really want to fight Trump elect a more militant union leadership that will fight the Taylor Law penalties instead of hiding behind them and work with other unions to build enough power to close down the nation. Even Trump supporters, when faced with the kinds of attacks on their jobs, may see the light.
At the Labor Day parade, RTC will focus on fighting fascism. Here is a section of their leaflet:
Fundamentally, there is a sense they don't run to win but to make their political points. Instead of member-driven based on working with others to address the major issues of concern - like the threats to their jobs and working conditions from charter schools -- or threats to their healthcare -- they often focus on supporting other unions (not a bad thing) while ignoring political struggles closer to home -- like the rally for 1096 or the D. 30 revolt or the Mulgrew purges.
One of the most egregious purges was David Kazansky who originally was pushed out of his Teacher Retirement position but given a specially created AFT job out of 52 Broadway but was fired from that job in June and is going back to the classroom.
Arthur Goldstein wrote in Feb 16, 2024 about the move to oust him from TRS:
UFT Unity has priorities. Alas, their ostensible job, serving the
members, is not among them. If it were, why would they be getting rid of
David Kazansky? Kazansky is a pension trustee, and a very effective
advocate. I know this firsthand, because when I’ve had questions, he’s
listened, done research, and come back with accurate answers. This
placed him in stark contrast with multiple UFT Unity employees who’ve
stated whatever passed through their minds that moment and hoped for the
best.
Kazansky has been snatched up by AFT. Evidently someone
there recognizes his ability and wishes to put it to use. So our loss is
their gain. Why wasn’t Kazansky put up for re-election?
That’s
pretty simple, actually. There are several UFT reps from District 11 in
the Bronx. There’s Kazansky, headed for AFT, Amy Arundell, now sorting
paper clips over at 52, maybe, and Paul Egan, now (gasp!) actually
working in a classroom as a teacher. My gosh, what a sorry fate! (Not
even sent to do nothing over at HQ,)
David recently wrote about his situation on substack:
The President of the UFT decided that the hundreds of thousands of
in-service UFT members and retirees would be better off without me
around. That my contributions as a full-time union rep for nearly 2
decades – longer if you count my PM staff work – amount to nothing as
long as it satisfies Michael Mulgrew’s deep and dark emotional need to
hurt those who do not conform to his definition of unquestioning
devotion and fealty...
Opposition to arbitrary and capricious behavior, policy, and leadership
is what led me and many others to union work. I find it terribly
unfortunate that you are expected to abandon those principles once you
are part of the UFT corporation.
I haven't written much about the healthcare changes though I did say a few words about the support given by some RTC reps on the Mulgrew appointed healthcare committee. More to come. Here is a snippet of opposition the RTC people don't seem to have while the ABC chats blew up with comments.
The Chief Leader - City Unions Announce New Municiple Health Plan
The city has announced a new health plan for active city employees,
pre-Medicare retirees and their dependents. A joint proposal from
EmblemHealth and United Healthcare was selected, subject to ratification
by the Municipal Labor Committee.
The lead up included promises of transparency by MLC leaders, who
don’t want to repeat missteps that doomed the original Medicare
Advantage plan for retirees. (In a 2021 court decision won by the New
York City Organization of Public Service Retirees, Judge Lyle Frank
called the process “irrational.”)
In 2023, the MLC approved a Medicare Advantage plan for Aetna —
without having read the contract. There are already red flags that
indicate no lessons learned.
For one day only, the MLC will provide one representative from each
union “access to the contract agreement and exhibits … at the offices of
DC 37.”
Actual members will not be able to view and provide feedback to their
leaders before the ratification vote, hurriedly planned for late
September.
Meanwhile, the United Federation of Teachers” health committee
quickly voted to send the proposal to their delegate assembly —also
without having seen the actual contract.
The selection of United Healthcare was made against the backdrop of a
Department of Justice investigation of their Medicare Advantage billing
practices. The probe focuses on allegations that the company
manipulates patient diagnoses to receive higher payments from the
federal government.
Finally, as the MLC barrels towards a vote, it can’t be ignored that
their secretary, Teamsters 237 President Gregory Floyd, serves on the
Board of EmblemHealth.
In a perfect world, he would either step down from the board or recuse himself from the vote.
As he is in the running to succeed Harry Nespoli as chair of the MLC,
it would definitely be the right thing to do, morally and politically.
Harry Weiner
The writer is a member of the Council of Municipal Retiree Organizations.
Moskowitz urged families to attend an all-hands-on-deck “Rally and March
for Excellence” on Sept. 18. Classroom instruction will be canceled so
students, staff and families can march across the Brooklyn Bridge.
Moskowitz also asked parents to “contact their elected officials five
times.” The email, which described powerful “anti-charter forces,” did
not mention Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani by name. But Mamdani is
the only major mayoral candidate running in November who has been
critical of charters. -- Elizabeth Kim
Want to fight fascism? Organize a protest to this rally.
Bulletin: Adams says he's running - until a better offer comes along.
Thursday, Sept. 4 -
Happy Back to School (I don't mean that as I was never truly happy to end my 2 months of freedom for the regimentation of school - though I was happy to see (some of) my colleagues and (most of) the children.
When I see current and former educators attack Mamdani, I imagine they have forgotten the charter wars of a decade ago when Cuomo backed Eva and forced our school system to pay the rent for charter schools and other attacks on public schools and our union which responded with a campaign against Cuomo that backed him off.
Eva has around 50 non-union schools. You may hate Mulgrew and Unity but they are better than no union at all. Despite the DOE chaos, many charter school teachers would prefer working in union backed schools.
Then there is the breaking and shocking news that Adams can be bought. I've been telling people who claim his ego won't let him drop out that he is just waiting for billionaires to come up with enough money to buy him off. I don't think Curtis Sliwa, who I actually like personally and even to some extent politically, will kill is credibility by dropping out.
Recent polls show Cuomo would win in a head to head with Mamdani, which I believe would happen -- some liberals in my own circle of contacts tell me they would back Cuomo -- the anti-Mamdani hysterical propaganda does penetrate. Last week I had to explain to family liberals that he is not taking over all the groceries in NYC - like in seizing the means of production - but setting up 5 groceries in food desert areas of each borough where there are no supermarkets.
As for childcare, he is offering a plan to extend the pre-k to pre-pre-k and beyond. I expect it can work fairly quickly by going for a gradual plan to include 2 year olds and using free space in public schools. Kicking charters out would help. How will he pay for it all? 2% tax on those making a million dollars a year. All those in that category, raise your hands. Seeing no one, I wonder at the hostility by those who don't make that much money over the poor plight of millionaires.
Someone asked me about Hochul not supporting any of his proposals and I pointed out that she is running for governor against a more liberal primary opponent and she will have to show some support on the affordability question in both the primary and general against that awful Trumpie Elise Stefanik who will get enormous national support. Hochul will not win - unless Mamdani mobilizes his people for her.
If he wins that is. Because I think the powers are so arrayed against him - he is actually a bigger threat to the Dem Party, which is heading in the direction of become the modern Whigs. I will make the bold prediction that the nail in the Dem coffin will be their ambivalent position on Israel and the mass murder it is committing which is becoming analogous to the slavery issue. Mamdani's position which horrified people as recently as a few months ago, is becoming mainstream in Dem party circles while the leadership obfuscates.
Remember you history buffs that Abe Lincoln abandoned the Whigs* to help start the then radical new Republican Party (c. 1854) that took a hard stance against slavery. But even as a member of DSA I still don't see them as a replacement party for the Dems. That is soon to evolve.
Anyway, yesterday's Brian Lehrer show went into all this in detail with Elizabeth Kim. I urge you to listen to that segment.
I will end with this: Your choice is Cuomo the monster or Mamdani -- swallow and do the right thing.
Here is the Elizabeth Kim article which covers a lot of that historical ground.
Facing the prospect of a new mayor
opposed to expanding charter schools, the prominent leader of New York
City’s leading charter network has sent out an SOS to supporters.
“There are currently serious threats to the educational excellence your
child deserves,” wrote Eva Moskowitz, the CEO of Success Academy, in an
email obtained by Gothamist. “We need 100% of parents to get on the bus
with us.”
Moskowitz urged families to attend an all-hands-on-deck “Rally and March
for Excellence” on Sept. 18. Classroom instruction will be canceled so
students, staff and families can march across the Brooklyn Bridge.
Moskowitz also asked parents to “contact their elected officials five
times.” The email, which described powerful “anti-charter forces,” did
not mention Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani by name. But Mamdani is
the only major mayoral candidate running in November who has been
critical of charters.
While Mamdani’s education platform has mostly centered on universal
child care, he said in a candidate questionnaire he opposes the
co-location of charters in buildings with traditional public schools.
Such a move would present obstacles to new charter schools, which avoid
the city’s cutthroat real estate market by opening in underutilized
city-owned school buildings.
Mamdani has also said he would review charter school funding as mayor.
The assemblymember from Queens has been endorsed by the city’s teachers
union, which is a fierce adversary of the charter movement. The union
has argued that charter schools rob resources from public school
students. Teachers at the schools are not typically unionized.
The brewing debate and rally evoke the intense clashes between Moskowitz
and former Mayor Bill de Blasio, who also opposed the expansion of
charters inside traditional public schools.
“It’s a good question to ask what’s the motivation because this issue has been relatively quiet,” de Blasio said.
He said he believed the city had “moved on” from heated debates about
charters taking over public schools that characterized his early
mayoralty — and that there were “good” charter schools worthy of City
Hall’s support.
But Mamdani’s main rival Andrew Cuomo has shown interest in reviving
that debate. The former governor recently released an education plan
that would shut down underperforming public schools and potentially
replace them with charters. Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg and hedge
fund billionaire Daniel Loeb were among the prominent charter supporters
who donated to Cuomo’s primary campaign.
Mayor Eric Adams, meanwhile, received backing from a pro-charter PAC in
2021. In January, he signed a bill into law giving charter schools
public funding for security guards.
The rally comes at a precarious moment for the charter sector. Charter
schools, which are publicly funded and privately run, serve 15% of city
students but have seen slower growth in enrollment since the pandemic,
according to the New York City Charter School Center. Albany lawmakers
have shown little interest in raising a statewide cap that would allow
new schools to open.
Declining federal funding means charters must also fight for a piece of a smaller education pie.
The charter school debate fits into Mamdani’s democratic socialist
platform. Charters have served as a proxy war between pro-business
interests who support free-market competition and left-leaning Democrats
who are skeptical of privately run schools funded by billionaires.
Some have said Mamdani is vulnerable when it comes to charters as his
opposition to expanding charters conflicts with his stance on improving
affordability and social equity. The need for better schools is most
pronounced in low-income neighborhoods that are mostly home to students
of color.
“The big picture is that there is a demand for charter schools in New
York City, particularly among families of color,” said Joseph Viteritti,
a Hunter College professor who has written a book on the school choice movement. “Because they tend to be the people who are most dissatisfied with their regular public schools.”
Mamdani’s campaign criticized charter schools and pledged he would
prioritize “fully funding” public schools as mayor in a statement.
“Zohran knows that New York City’s public schools are the foundation of
our communities, our economy, and our workforce,” said Dora Pekec, a
spokesperson for the campaign. “Yet charter schools siphon resources
away from public education, often without real accountability or
oversight.”
A spokesperson for Success Academy confirmed the upcoming rally but declined to make Moskowitz available for an interview.
Moskowitz is leaning on an old message. The email sent out last week was
virtually identical to one she crafted for a march in 2013, when de
Blasio was the mayoral front-runner.
“Your child’s education is threatened. Our very existence is threatened.
Opponents want to take away our funding and our facilities,” she wrote
at the time. “These attacks are a real danger — we cannot stand idly
by.”
The UFT Retired Teacher
Chapter is supporting this rally organized by the NYC Organization of Public Service Retirees and we hope you can make it! Spread the word.
Tuesday September 2nd
11am at City Hall
It is Mayor Eric Adams birthday, and
guess what? He turns 65 years old & is now eligible for Medicare!
The time is NOW!! We have to highlight at this press conference/rally
that this is the BEST way to protect our Medicare and earned and vested
benefits. He must tell the Speaker to get this bill to the floor so he
can sign it. It will be held on
the STEPS OF CITY HALL. Arrive by 10:15am
Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2025
I'm about to head over to the ferry to attend the rally but wanted to get this out. See Marianne Friday night video:
I laughed out loud (with the mic off) numerous times when I attended an RTC Exec Bd zoom yesterday. Support for the rally by the RTC Exec Bd, loaded with ARISE people who despise Marianne, was a pleasant surprise. The 1096 city council law would protect retirees from evil mayors. (Mamdani won't sign on to that bill even though he indicates he would not put retirees into medicare advantage -he may not have to as Trump and fellow gangsters are going to take care of that.)
Other than support for the rally, I was not a happy camper at the general non-militant response from RTC EB and the Retiree Advocate crew that make up half the EB.
When I saw this from Unity Caucus claiming unanimous support from the Mulgrew hand-picked healthcare committee and knowing that 4 RTC/RA officers had attended, I asked in an email if they all voted for it given the history of offering misleading and manaipulative information going back to the 2005 contract and getting the hand-picked so-called oppo people to vote for it and then using that fact to claim bi-partisan support when they mass sell it to the membership. There was no response - until yesterday's meeting when to my shock the attendees confirmed they had voted for it under the argument "We can't be opposed to them automatically. Union leaders are not the enemy."
Holy shit. Some of these people have faced 50 years of Unity deception, manipulation and control and still don't get it. But then again, many of them have been part of New Action which made the dirty deal with Randi over 20 years ago and spent a dozen years finding excuses to stay in that coalition. I call that the New Action (or France's I surrender in WW2) mentality. Some call it a Vichy mentality.
I hung out with a prominent member of MORE last week who told me no one from MORE attended the meeting, so they are off the hook. But RA and NAC are mot. But still watch the Unity hacks praise the loyal ARISE oppo and slam the ABCs for not taking part in a farce.
The very same Unity people who told and sold us that their Medicate Adv plan was better than Medicare. Remember Mulgrew telling us this time and again - it's just a name, they are the same? At the very least, abstain while waiting for full information, a position Marianne seemed to take in her Friday video. (Of course Unity attacked her for that.)
A suggestion that we ask the lawyers Marianne uses to help us figure out what is happening was mocked. "We have UFT lawyers to do that for us. Let's write a letter to Mulgrew asking for UFT lawyers do the job." Yes, it's the "Let's Plead" strategy that's been so successful.
Meanwhile, the ABC chats have been exploding.
One of the key failures of the RTC was to change a successful plan to push for a membership vote on healthcare changes to a DA vote - which is a joke considering how Unity has gained even more control despite the 300 RA and supposed 100 MORE delegates.
Here is Arthur's take:
Apparently the RTC members who did attend voted yes for Mulgrew’s proposed healthcare changes. So there you have it: RA under Unity’s umbrella…
Trump is out there introducing pre-approvals to Medicare,
in a clear effort to make it more like Medicare Advantage. This will be
introduced in six states next year, New Jersey included, and it’s
something we need to fight.
If you’re under 65, or in
service, there is a new health plan out there for city workers. Unity,
predictably, says it’s the best thing since sliced bread. Someone once
pointed out to me there is, in fact, artisan bread. You cut it with a
knife, and it’s got a wonderful crust. It’s got great texture, and isn’t
full of chemicals to ensure it can sit in a plastic bag for two years
without getting stale.
Queens UFT, in a social media post,
wrote, “The new plan, like the current GHI CBP plan, allows for the
option of tiering in the future to penalize hospitals that price gouge
or act in bad faith.” This, to me, raises a red flag. While the current
plan may have that option, I can’t recall it being exercised. Last I looked, a hospital visit would set me back 300 bucks on GHI...... Arthur’s substack -
NYC Public Service Retirees Unveil Giant 65th Birthday Card for NYC Mayor Adams
Group Invites Mayor to Join Their Organization
Asks Mayor to Support City Council Bill to Protect Retiree Health Insurance
NEW YORK, N.Y. – Today, New York City’s public service retirees come together at City Hall to celebrate Mayor Adams 65th trip
around the sun with a giant birthday card and special request: support
Intro 1096! This City Council bill put forth by Councilmember
Christopher Marte, District One, and co-sponsored by Councilmember
Robert Holden, District 3, is the key to permanent protection for the
healthcare of hundreds of thousands of retired city workers who
currently rely on Medicare. As of today, Mayor Adams has become one of
us. When he completes his city service he’ll also rely on Medicare.
“The mayor is no longer on the sidelines in this shameful attempt to undermine healthcare for retirees,” said Marianna Pizzitola, President, NYC Organization of Public Service Retirees which represents more than 250,000 city retirees. “His
insurance is also in the crosshairs now. He has said he will support
us. Now is the time to SHOW us he will support us by backing intro
1096!”
Health
insurance for scores of the city’s most senior retirees has become a
political pawn in recent years. Unscrupulous union bigwigs and their
elected allies have championed a switch to private insurance in the name
of alleged cost-savings. Their proposal is a for-profit alternative run
by Aetna, deceptively called “Medicare Advantage.” It is anything but.
And of course, dollar-for-dollar, it does not save the taxpayer a single
penny. “Advantage” does, ironically, diminish the quality of medical
coverage and access for the retirees who need it most. Meanwhile, our
members, many with pensions of under $26,000, are relying on food
pantries for assistance and faced with the choice of deferring medical
care.
In
recent weeks, Mayor Adams has expressed support for ending this attack
on retirees and retaining their well-earned Medicare. We thank him. He
now has a vested interest in following through on his words with
tangible action. Supporting Intro 1096 is the best course of action.
New
York City’s retired workforce showed up for New Yorkers every day for
decades. As they grow older, now is not the time to pull the rug out
from under them. Join us in championing Intro 1096. Everyone knows
someone affected by this. Support your neighbor, your relative, your
fifth-grade teacher – along with every firefighter, police officer, and
sanitation worker who made a difference serving this city!
###
About NYC Organization of Public Service Retirees
In
the aftermath of the proposed Medicare bait-and-switch by the prior
administration, this organization was formed to give the otherwise
silent and unrepresented retirees a voice. Many tens of thousands
strong, we have now grown into a force for resistance against any effort
to diminish our medical insurance. We proudly stand at the forefront of
accountability – speaking truth to power against those who seek to sell
out those who have upheld their oath and their promise to serve.