I chronicled Mulgrew's move to make every aspect of the UFT based on loyalty in Part 1: https://ednotesonline. blogspot. com/2026/07/how-mulgrew-undermined-uft-pension-dept. html. The point of my recent articles is that something is going on inside the. ...
The point of my recent articles is that something is going on inside the
tent that is getting some people to give up the money. And while the
number is low, there is a lot of people seething but not willing - yet. I
do know that a number of Unity people voted for ABC in the election.
Will we see more breaks in the next few years? My contention has been that Unity can be beaten when there are enough defectors with school-level networks that ally with the opposition to break the Unity monopoly at the school level. There were signs in last year's election.
Part 2 focuses on the TRS elections as a function of the pension department and how Mulgrew installed his operatives who put political loyalty over competence in a crucial area of the UFT where every member ends up using on the way to retirement. I include the story of one of the UFT's top pension consultants who was in much demand until he was sent back to teaching at the end of August 2025, seemingly a threat due to his attempts to run for TRS rep in the 2026 election. He ran anyway.
Wednesday, July 8, 2026
The recent Teachers Retirement System election put a focus on former Unity loyalists who have been cast out of the cult.
Frank Panebianco and David Kazansky ran against Unity's Tom Brown. Both had been fired from
the UFT.
TRS elections have been neglected by the forces
aligned against Unity for way too long, thus allowing Unity to control
all 3 pension reps who are elected to 3 year staggered terms. For
years I've been urging people to not let Unity escape any election
without being challenged and to use elections as an outreach and
organizing tool as prep for the big enchilada - the general union
election.
In March 2024 Mulgrew dumped David Kazansky, who
had served for 9 years as TRS rep because David was known to be independent and willing to ask questions at TRS meetings and not subject to automatic loyalty to Mulgrew.
David was given a job as an AFT
pension rep, with Randi Weingarten having the AFT pick up his salary. That led to the first TRS election in decades with Brooklyn Tech math teacher Ben Morgenroth running against the unknown Christina McGrath, David's replacement, an election that shocked Unity and the DOE which had to run the election. Frank Panebianco, the UFT's leading pension consultant, was also shocked as he had been waiting for almost a decade to run for TRS and was denied once again.
Since the DOE never had to run a real election, there were many screwups that led to both the union and the opposition raising legal objections.
In June 2025, Kazansky was fired from the AFT job and had his UFT
leave rescinded and went back to teaching in an
elementary school in the Bronx that September. He announced sometime in February 2026 a run for TRS rep.
Frank Panebianco was also shocked when he was notified by UFT HR department in late August 2025, just a day before school began, that his leave was not being renewed and had to hustle to get back to his old school from 13 years before.
Everyone I spoke to, including people in the opposition, have good things to say about Frank as one of, if not the, top pension person at the UFT, someone that even the top officials at the UFT have used for their final pension consultations. Frank also has a background in finance, qualifing him to be an effective TRS rep.
A time-line of recent TRS elections and changes in the pension department at 52 Broadway
2013: Frank Panebianco is promoted from an after school Bronx pension rep to full-time at 52.
2014: Tom Brown becomes TRS rep when Mona Romain retires. Frank is alternate.
2015: Long-time pension expert Mel Aaronson, who fundamentally had free reign to train and promote pension reps, retires from TRS and tells Frank that he deserves the job but there is worry at the top the opposition would complain and they are going with David Kazansky instead. Why the oppo would complain about Frank given the oppo never had comments on TRS elections, is a mystery. Frank is alternate.
2016: Sandy March retires and tells Frank he would be best for the job but they can't have 3 white men. Debra Penny, UFT Staten Island Borough Rep replaces her.
With strong pension figures like Aaronson and March out of the way, the 2016 TRS election is Mulgrew's move to take control and politicize the pension/TRS process. Frank is alternate. Debra Penny immediately takes over as the boss of the pension department as Mulgrew's agent.
2017: Tom Brown runs for second term. Frank is alternate.Frank is asked to recruit a minority woman for a full-time pension position. Only Victoria Lee from Queens pension is available. She moves to full-time at 52. Some in Queens question the decision.
2018: David runs again, Frank is alternate.
2019: Penny runs again, Frank is alternate
2020: Tom Brown runs again, Frank is alternate
2021: David runs again. Mulgrew supposedly tries to replace him but RandyWeingarten and Mel Aaronson intervene. Frank is alternate.
2022: Penny runs for second term but it is known she will resign before her term is up. Victoria Lee is her chosen successor and is the alternate, the only time Frank has not been the alternate.
As expected, Penny resigns mid-term and Victoria Lee is chosen to replace her. Some in the pension department are not happy with the choice.
2023: Tom Brown starts another 3-year term and Frank is once again the alternate.
To this point there has not been an opponent, so no TRS elections.
2024: Mulgrew removes Kazansky as TRS rep who is offered a special pension job paid for by Randi at the AFT but leaving him working out of 52. David
did not want to leave the TRS job and word leaks he was afoul of
Mulgrew and possibly Lee and Brown because he asked too many questions
at TRS meetings of pension consultants, questions that should have been
asked.
See: TRS Passport Funds Underperform Over Last 10 Years: TDA investment options cost members hundreds of thousands in lost returns
There is shock that newcomer Christina McGrath, an ally of Victoria Lee, is brought in to run in 2024. Ben Morgenroth declares his candidacy, forcing the first TRS election in decades. The election, run by the DOE through school principals is a total mess. Unity leadership is forced to engage in a campaign for the first time. Ben gets about a third of the vote in very low turnout.
Frank is once again the alternate, and is now pissed off after being passed over for so many years. The "3 white men" argument no longer works since McGrath would be the second woman. UFT people were asking Frank, "How could Mulgrew pass over you for Christina?"
March, 2024: Frank asks to Meet with Mulgrew after McGrath is endorsed by Unity
Frank tells Mulgrew he wants out - "send me back to the Bronx."
Mulgrew wants him to stay and apologized for playing politics. Frank asks Mulgrew to agree to a raise, allowing him to work two days remote and to run for TRS in 2026 when Tom Brown retires. They shake on it:
Mulgrew: "You have my word and my word means everything. He praises Frank - "You never asked for anything. I didn't know you wanted the job. I want to make it up to you."
Weeks later Mulgrew asks Frank: “How is that raise I gave you?"
Frank: I never got it or the remote days either.
Going into summer '24 - still no raise.
Oct, 2024
2 days remote finally comes through for Frank but no raise.
Mulgrew tells Frank is was a tough battle to get him the remote and it took 7 months of battling.
Frank asks "Why? Aren't you the president?"
Mulgrew shrugs.
Victoria Lee who is also UFT Treasurer, and most likely had to approve the raise, tells Frank: "There's no way you will ever make more money than me."
Frank never gets the raise.
Jan 2025 - Frank and Victoria Lee air things out. She says "You need to be by my side - people see you with me - that's the way to get promoted."
She brings
in Jeff Novzen to 52 Broadway full-time, a friend of her husband, who is a school principal, as a
pension rep trainee despite Frank's objections that Novzen didn't have the
knowledge or experience.
Frank is shocked and tells Lee: “All the senior consultants that have years of experience and Jeff Novzen has not even done a final consultation. You picked a trainee over all the experienced special reps?"
Over the past few years Frank has been impressed with the work of some borough pension reps and recommends a few for promotion to central but is blocked by Penny and Lee. Leah Linn out of the Queens office is one of those reps. A prolific social media presence, she signs up to run with ABC in the 2025 election and is fired by Mulgrew in June 2025.
Word spreads in the pension dept that Novzen is being groomed to run
for TRS in 2026 when Tom Brown is supposedly retiring.
May 2025 - Victoria Lee runs for re-election and Ben Morgenroth runs against her.
Lee challenges his petitions and Ben is disqualified due to a minor
technicality.
June
2025 -UFT pension retreat - Lee celebrates her victory at the June 2025 UFT pension rep meeting bragging how she
got Ben Morgenroth disqualified. "I won, I won. It doesn't matter how you win as long as you win."
She knew she wasn't well-liked inside the caucus and among the pension consultants and was nervous about her getting the kind of support Tom Brown ends up getting a year later, so disqualifying Ben on a technicality avoids an election. Her next election, due in 2028 at the same time as the next general UFT election may not be so easy.
At the same meeting she publicly castigates and humiliates Tom Brown telling him
he should retire. She wanted him gone so she could put her husband's
friend Jeff Novzin to replace him at TRS a year later.
June/July
2025 - Tom Brown to Frank:"My dream is to retire and you to replace me." Apologizes for not standing up and allowing "them" to politicize the pension and TRS department and
says he will retiree. Frank is the most qualified to be on TRS and
should run because no one thinks Jeff Novzen is competent to be a TRS rep and Frank would win easily. Says Frank is the best choice and
should run for TRS as he is knowledgeable, popular and has a lot of
contacts. Frank decides he will run and starts touching base with
people.
July/August 2025 - Frank begins a behind the scenes campaign for the 2026 TRS election by contacting his network.
August 2025: A day before school began, Frank received a notice from UFT HR
that his leave was being revoked and if he wasn't back in a school the next day he would not have a job. This was a major shock and he
called Asst. Secty Mike Sill to find out what was going on. Sill told
him he had no idea and knew nothing about it. When Frank reached Mulgrew
he was told that Mulgrew would look into it.
Sept. 2025: A few days later, Frank was back in his old
school, where he hadn't been for 13 years, teaching science in
kindergarten. HR
tells Frank, "We were just told to do this by your supervisor, Vicky."
Nov. 2025: Mulgrew spends about 2 months looking into what is going on in
the pension department and after doing his own inquiry he has a meeting
with Frank and tells Frank: “I asked people all over and found out
that they said, When it comes to pension we only go to Frank, we
don’t even waste our time with anyone else because Frank is the most
knowledgeable and he gets back to us.
Mulgrew also says he found out Frank is doing all the work (an indication that the HR rationale for terminating his leave was bogus), everyone loves him
and he has a big tier 6 push and that he needs him back
because he needs his best pension person there for that.
Frank agrees to return but tells Mulgrew only if he holds to his word about the trustee position and the raise.
Jan. 2026
Mulgrew offers Frank his job back, agreeing to a raise and two days remote but Mulgrew says he cannot agree on the
TRS election, despite his previous handshake. (Victoria Lee pal Jeff Novzen is being groomed for the TRS rep). Frank walks despite suffering a 50K pay cut.
More details of that meeting:
Frank
reiterates his requests that Mulgrew shook his hand on: two days of
remote, a raise and running for TRS.
Mulgrew says “he can’t" and Frank says, "you gave me your word" and Mulgrew repeats, "Well I can't."
Frank responds, "I am not coming back to do all the work and be the one who runs all the projects and be the most qualified but
instead in the spring I’m supposed to sit there at the DA again and
watch you endorse someone else for trustee that has no experience. I’m sorry I’m not doing that again."
Mulgrew says
"I can’t believe you made me do all that work finding out everything for nothing."
Frank: "You
did all that work and found out the truth that I have been the one who
keeps getting screwed because of politics."
Tom
brown calks Frank begging him to come back, promising him if he came
back he would talk to Mulgrew and tell him to endorse Frank.
Frank tells him, "Absolutely not Tom. There is no way I’m coming back because you have never stood up for me before and I don’t trust that you would now. Besides
you are afraid of Victoria and she will boss you around pushing her guy
Jeff and you will let that happen so I will not come back."
Feb 2026: David Kazansky announces he is running for TRS. Mulgew, nervous he'd beat a newcomer like Victoria Lee pal Jeff Novzen, gets Tom Brown to run again.
Tom Brown: Mulgrew is telling him he has to run.
Frank, feeling he has been slighted over a decade in his quest to run for TRS also announces he is running, with a number of people telling him they are secretly voting for him. David Kazansky reaches out to discuss the problems of two people running. Nothing gets settled even if it clear that neither of them could win.
A massive Unity campaign for Brown is organized like a military operation with lots of pressure on the Unity faithful to get out the vote. They get 30k petition signatures when they only need 1k. Frank thinks he can carve out a piece of the Unity votes for Tom plus his own contacts.
May/June 2026: TRS Campaign Results: A smashing victory for Tom Brown with 35k votes. 66%. The Unity campaign has won big, a model for future campaigns.
David
gets over 15K with the support of the ABC network plus his own. If the
legacy caucuses like RA, MORE and NAC hadn't sat this out (though a few
individuals backed them) the vote would have been higher.
Frank gets almost 4k votes, pretty good since he had his own personal network with no institutional support.
Combined,
they hit about 19k, about 34%, which would probably be a bit higher
with the legacy groups involved, a rising proportion of anti-Unity
people in any UFT election at this point. Let's put it at the high 30s.
Their shortsightedness in not seeing TRS elections as a building block for
the oppo is endemic to the legacy groups, some of whom are more focused about
fighting for BDS on Israeli bonds than actually getting Unity out of
power.
I will effort to get spreadsheets with election outcomes school by school.
Will there be repercussions for Unity people in areas where David or Frank had more votes than Tom Brown?
2027 TRS Election
Christina
McGrath should be running for re-election but she began to rebel over
Lee's bossing her around and they end up in screaming matches and are no
longer speaking. Debra
Penny is also upset with Victoria Lee and tells her that
she is one of 3 trustees that are equal and she is not Christina’s
boss. Victoria snapped back, “Yes I am!”
Inside betting is that McGrath won't be the Unity candidate in 2027 if Lee gets her way. There is also the specter that Tom Brown, at age 75, decides to retire this year, thus adding a second election.
Either way, expect there to be an opposition candidate, in both 2027 and 2028 when Lee runs again, hopefully one united campaign. David, Frank and Ben, all very capable, in the mix.
And that the legacy caucuses will get the message that TRS elections are a building block to defeat Unity and support any campaign against Unity.
Afterburn -
After speaking with my resources and learning about what had gone on over the years I was able to have someone connect me with Frank to hear what he thought about the results of the election and this is what he wrote:
I wish Tom the best of luck, he was like a big brother to me and I hope he stays the 3 years for the term, because that is what people expect from him when they voted. It’s too bad he was ‘forced’ to run. There are people who actually cared about the position and wanted to be able to use their knowledge and experience to help members and not make this political.
Engler is the power behind the throne at UFT & Mulgrew defers to her .... anonymous
The NY Post has a story about emails from a year ago from Ellie Engler
complaining about Howie Schoor's comments to Bronx staffers.
“I had a disturbing meeting with the Bronx folks about what you said
to them,” Engler wrote last August in an e-mail to Schoor that was
copied to UFT boss Michael Mulgrew and other top personnel. “They
reported that you said, everyone hates Ellie and I am getting in your
way to do the work you want to do.”
I
am seeing things in a new light. I always assumed Unity was monolithic
and there was little internal debate - that since Shanker the person at the
top controlled everything. But an interesting perspective is emerging as
current and former higher level Unity reveal the internals. This is Part1. Part 2 is here: https://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/2026/07/nepotism-and-cronyism-mulgrew.html
Despite
serious disagreements, activists within the usual suspect legacy
caucuses opposed to Unity managed to have some working relationships
with the leadership. In a sense, the active Unity and oppo people became
a sort of sub-class in the union of people who were involved beyond the
regular membership - a sort of synchrony of common interests, which
comes undone for a few months every 3 years during UFT election. These
are the people you are likely to see in early September at Labor Day
Parades where all sides greet each other with some warmth.
We knew which officials were competent, such
as Amy Arundell. Appointees to union positions has always been
political and based on loyalty to Unity Caucus and the leadership but
being capable and competent was part of the equation.
Yet,
over the past few years there has been a shift as we saw less and less
competence and internal and external unhappiness with the Mulgrew
leadership and we see major purges within the caucus and threats to
those who don't conform.
The
theme of this post delves into this Mulgrew shift - total control of
every aspect of the UFT, total loyalty expected and valued over
competence, as evidenced by comments from current and former Unity and
union officials. That has led to fear and resentment among the Unity
faithful.
UFT
full time and part- time staff were threatened with their jobs if they
didn’t get the votes from their school for Tom Brown in the TRS
election, a pattern Mulrew has set since The Friday Night Unity Purge/Massacre of June 27, 2025. The
Queens Borough Rep, who replaced Amy Arundell, held meetings telling
pension consultants, “If you don’t get the votes for Tom, you are
replaceable." In areas where Tom Brown votes were weak there may be some
nervous district reps.
I use the Frank Panebianco story as a case study of the loss of competence at the UFT, not to mention David Kazansky,
both of whom ran against Tom Brown, their former colleague, in the
recent TRS election. Shedding these two, along with Amy, D. 30 Rep
Ashley Rzonca, Leah Lin, paras Hector Ruiz, Jr., and Migda Rodriguez is a serious brain drain. A Unity insider commented:
Downgrading competence:The essence of internal UFT policy: Never pick a successor
who might do a better job than you. Always pick someone less competent
than you so they won't do better.
UFT members have been noticing.
More Words from inside Unity:
No
one is a free thinker anymore. Mulgrew controls every aspect of the
union. When I started and was recruited to Unity, there were spaces for
debate, conversation, dare I say suggestions. All totally gone now.
Mulgrew
makes everyone have a fear-based mindset so even if you’re good at your
job you don’t really do it the best it can be done because that’s not
what’s wanted.
The entire union. Teacher center, and welfare fund are cash cows.
Numerous Unity oldheads told us that under Randi, it was also a
dictatorship, but that she at least not only tolerated dissenting
voices, but wanted a couple of them in the room when an issue was being
considered. When she made her decision that was that, but at least she
heard both/all sides before she did. Under Mulgrew all of those
dissenting voices have been pushed out.
Don't
forget the ouster of Maria Niera from NYSUT Leadership a decade ago and
making sure we all voted for their endorsed candidates by checking the
ballots before we submitted them.
The
firing of pension expert Frank Panebianco days before the end of summer
because he was telling people he was going to run for TRS because Tom
Brown told him he would retire. When he asked Mike Sill and Mulgrew
about it, they said they knew nothing about it. So who fired Frank? Read
the surprising answer below.
Mulgrew
shook hands on it: "I give you my word and nothing means more to me
than my word." Soon after, Mulgrew went back on his word.
Like Trump, Mulgrew seems to have the ability to unite more and more people against him, even those with differences.
My
mantra over the past few decades has been that Unity will not be
defeated until the oppo organizes in enough schools to challenge their
control. Yet, as elections have proven, other than high schools, there
has not been much of a dent in Unity control with the exception of the
2024 retiree win, which is proving that unless you win the entire union,
not a lot changes.
The
2025 general union election showed that there are defections from Unity
but many defectors did not feel comfortable landing in one of the
existing legacy caucuses but did feel comfortable with ABC, a new
entity. The question is can humpty-dumpty be put back together again
where legacy caucuses and ABC can come to some form of accommodation?
Their
combined total of 46% offers the possibility of victory in 2028 but the
resentment towards ABC upstarts is palpable, from the legacies and
Unity, where we see them at times working together as both are
threatened. As legacy groups fade in influence, the future oppo to Unity
may hold the irony of Mulgrew's actions are helping form that
opposition.
Let's
look at some of the growing cracks in Unity by focusing on the Teacher
Retiremee election and how it is linked to the pension department S
candidates and the impact on the pension department.
My
recent blogs on the TRS election leads to bigger conclusions on the way
the leadership has politicized the formerly semi-independent areas of
the union.
Mulgrew wants tight control and total loyalty from every corner of the union. Current and former Unity insiders point to:
Pension/TRS: Victoria Lee acts as boss in Mulgrew's name.
Welfare Fund: Geoff Sorkin in name only.
Call Center: Salesforce replaces UFT staff.
Teacher center: Mary Vocarro turns it political.
Grievance:
Mark Collins. There hasn’t been a real grievance chair since Howie
Solomon. There is no institutional knowledge and a fear to take cases.
So much is non-precedential, so it’s wack a mole.
Political
action: The director is there just as a figure head. Cassie Prugh and
Mulgrew make all the decisions. (Witness the decision to endorse Dan
Goldman over Brad Lander, exposing Mulgrew's true politics.)
Borough
offices: Amy Arundell fired from Queens office, along with Leah Linn,
not the first time put in someone under his thumb. In 2016 Mulgrew
replaced the popular Brooklyn Boro rep Debbie Poulos with a political
hack according to some staffers. Some point to changes in the Bronx
office too.
All politicized. The removal of institutional knowledge and so similar to Trump.
Coming Next: Part 2 - Genesis of the 2026 TRS Election.
The TRS election put a focus on former Unity loyalists who have been cast out of the cult. Recent history of TRS elections. How Mulgrew undermined trust by politicizing the pension dept and putting loyalty over competence.
The UFT leadership continues to
be in bed with the establishment political machine that often is not
aligned to our values and not held accountable for making decisions that
affect us. The uft is the democratic establishment and Mulgrew will try very hard to keep the Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Grace Meng, Hilary Clinton, Randi weingarten etc etc etc power going along with his own.
Sunday, June 28, 2026
Before I get into thoughts on the recent election, tonight is a Fix Retiree Benefits Zoom. Stop by and check it out. The goal is to do one hour from 7-8 but it might run a bit longer. I need to write a lot more on what's going on in the retiree chapter and might get a chance at the zoom tonight.
Congrats to all my still in-service friends on the end of the school year and another step to retirement. But I should point out that a number of my colleagues in ABC ended the school year writing about how much they still love teaching ever two decades in.
I'm about to head out to a DSA celebratory beach party that will last all day.
Tuesday I speculated on the election outcome. I expected a closer race in 7 where Reynoso had the advantage of the Nydia Vazquez and his own machines, which turned out to be barely machines at all, a sign of the deterioration of the Dem Party generally and how non-competitive it has been nationally. National and local media were going nuts in shock over the big 3 wins by Mamdani as all losing candidates were backed by the Dem machine led by Hakeem Jeffries. And if Mamdani had allowed Chi
Ossi to primary him, guess what?
Jeffries will face a primary next time
and if he was smart he would take a run for Chuck's Senate seat, though
DSA will probably go for that, though I'm not sure there is enough DSA
muscle to win a state race. Or Jeffries might just do a turn around if he's a good politician. But DSA should also keep its discipline and talk of a 2028 candidate is fantasy at this point, though Ro Khana is beginning to look like an acceptable candidate along the lines of Brad Lander has been. Not as left but not center.
It was a smashing victory for DSA which also elected 16 members at the state level and is spreading outside NY.
Reynoso was more embedded in traditional
backroom political dealmaking and backed by the low-expectations wing of
the labor movement, in which politics is mostly a matter of making safe
bets on electing and reelecting traditional corporate Democrats — even
in cities and neighborhoods where it’s clear that the horizons have
shifted in a more expansive pro-worker direction. That approach to politics was decisively defeated.
Center Dems don't seem to have enough of a ground game left, relying on endorsements and ads but not enough of a GOTV game.
I would apply the same idea to UFT elections where the only way to defeat Unity is with a ground game, which the oppo has never developed.
I've been a fringe member of DSA
for about 8 years even when I disagree with a bunch of their positions
but love the energy and organizing ability. I attended South Brooklyn
branch meetings until the pandemic. They live up to the democratic label
with extreme democracy at local levels. I get to vote on so many issues
and leaders. Recently I've hooked up with a group of DSA in Rockaway
and we canvased for Mamdani. They are even having an all day beach party
in Rockaway today.
Tuesday was also a smashing loss for the UFT/Unity leadership. Look at this graphic:
An ABCer on FB commented:
Michael Mulgrew and the UFT leadership not only once again backed a losing political candidate, they did so:
a)
when every single poll had him behind the candidate that ultimately won
— at one point Goldman was polling nearly *thirty points* behind
Lander, and
b)
without a vote from the Delegate Assembly, the only body in the UFT
with the authority to make political endorsements (unless the Delegate
Assembly votes to kick the decision to the Executive Board, which to be
clear in this instance they didn’t)
Three out of four lost, though I liked the Bores endorsement which was interesting since the UFT endorsed Micah Lasher last time for the state assembly, as I wrote about a year ago:
What happened I wonder for them to abandon Lasher? Maybe the Tier 6 issue stuck?
Mulgrew endorsed every one of the three losing Congressional candidates. The
UFT endorsed Goldman over Lander without an endorsement vote from the
Delegate Assembly while Mulgrew lied, claiming NYSUT endorsed Goldman.
Which means someone somewhere in the union (guess who?) made a
decision to undemocratically exercise their political prerogative over
the members. Doing this not only violated the UFT
constitution, but more importantly it’s flat-out wrong and selfish, and
made all the more so when you consider that whoever this presumed
"expert" was backed a candidate that lost by nearly 30%.
The union leadership continues to be in bed with the establishment political machine that often is not aligned to our values or not held accountable for making decisions that affect us.
DSA has been a hot item in the mainstream press with the emphasis on the growing threat to the Democratic Party by both the right and the so-called "moderate" Dems, which is really corporate/AIPAC friendly. James Carville positively lost it, joining Trump in seeing a threat to the nation by DSA wins.
Think of the Corp Dems calls for DSA to stay out of the Dem Party and form their own party. The James Carville off the wall comments. Imagine they replaced the Green Party in a much more effective manner and ran a third party presidential candidate, thus making the Dems a sure loser. Oh the howls of protest for them doing exactly what they are being told to do if they did not be part of the big tent?
Most Dems still say the party is big-tent even with the extreme views expressed by some winning candidates. Now never forget that our own beloved UFT/Unity leadership are very much part of the anti-left Dem Party going back to the Shanker roots of supporting the Vietnam War. The Mamdani endorsement was forced on them by the stark choice of him or Cuomo - and the clear direction of the momentum. But make no mistake, the UFT fundamentally is where it was politically in the Shanker years.
The UFT leadership engaged in a vicious red-baiting attack on DSA as recently as January, 2025:
Well I was wrong on that as it was clear Cuomo was going down and give Mulgrew credit for hopping on board with a winner, though it may not help much in upcoming contract negotiations.
The Unity crowd toned down their critiques of MORE and ARISE with the rise of ABC, a big tent group that both ARISE components and Unity see as a bigger threat, as it proved in the election with their 32% compared to the ARISE 14%.
How come the DSA crowd centered in the 14-year old MORE Caucus has failed to develop a ground game in the UFT,
as evidenced by the 14% vote in the 2025 election for the ARISE slate?
Remember, the other two caucuses in ARISE are retiree RA and the mostly
retiree New Action, so MORE was expected to carry the load and clearly
failed. The failure of DSA people in the UFT compared to the success of
DSA on the larger playing field is worth exploring in a follow-up but
here's my initial view: MORE began in 2011 as a big-tent operation but
post-2016, the DSA/ISO (now defunct) leadership decided to narrow the
tent with a move to the left that pushed out even fellow-leftists, many
of whom have drifted to ABC.
One of the keys has been the hemorrhaging
of MORE members who leave teaching or jump out of the intensity of the
regular classroom. Or jump from school to school. I came into my new
school after 3 years of teaching when I got my full appointment as the
resident big mouth radical and turned many people off. It took me 5
years to begin to gain the trust of my colleagues and yes, I modified my
big mouth radicalism. I heard Hasan Piker last week make the point that
newly organized often go over the top and it takes years to learn to
temper things as you work with people not of your views.
The internal big tent vs narrow tent struggle in MORE was between the older lefty ICE people and the younger International Socialists who at one point according to internal memos, considered giving up on the MORE project until they came up with the idea of going to DSA to recruit teachers into MORE - and they were so successful they were able to dominate by 2018 and push the ICE people out, this cementing MORE as a hard left caucus, which meant they could never win a UFT election on their own, as they found out when they ran alone in the 2019 election, thus forcing them into alliances with United for Change in 2022 and ARISE in 2025, with increasing alienation from a strong minority that either doesn't want to run in elections or doesn't want to compromise with other groups that don't adhere to their rigid ideology.
Big tent vs narrow tent
Unlike the DSA in the big tent Dem Party, the DSA faction in MORE believes the caucus must remain small tent pure. I contend that if the original MORE as big tent that included people from ICE had been adhered to, MORE would be a contender. Let me give you one example of a hard-core MOREista I was friendly with a few years ago. She texted me asking where I stood on Israel about a year and a half ago and I replied I was still working things out due to my growing up in the post-holocaust era. I was Done. Ghosted.
The DSA has proven it can be a major force on all levels of politics with a big-tent approach in the Dem party and internally there is some room for a variety of caucuses to operate. Is that a perfect solution to democracy? I had offered that type of idea at the very first meeting of MORE -- let ideas compete in an open way. But that's not the way of ideologues.
In my final days in MORE I
proposed they were more of a club or advocacy group in the UFT, which I
was fine with - just not a caucus in UFT elections and I have been
proven right. My advice is to not run as a caucus in UFT elections but
to be open to whatever members who do want to be involved do so. ABC
would be the perfect place for them to land. If MORE followed my advice,
ARISE would be dead, it it already hasn't died and we would have one
group facing Unity head on, with an actual chance to win in 2028. But
don't expect practicality to win out.
The New Socialist Revolution: Zohran Mamdani's remarkable night
Mamdani cannot impose his will on the Democratic Party like
Trump has on the Republicans. The moderate, institutional Democratic
faction lucked out; they will not, for now, be driven to extinction.
They will not suffer the fate of all the Republican politicians who
stood against Trump over the last decade. Luck,
though, comes with caveats. Within the five boroughs—this beating heart
of Empire—they are going to have to fight for their life.
It's primary day in NYC and lots of scrutiny on Mamdani supported candidates in 3 congressional races where he backs candidates closely or loosely connected to the Dem Socialists, but all pushing back against Dem party central. In every one of these, Mulgrew has led the UFT to support the other candidate, thus cementing the view that I always have had that the UFT is tied to the traditional corporate Dem wing and the Mamdani endorsement was an outlier due to Mamdani's sweeping support. Mulgrew lied and maneuvered the DA into supporting Dan Goldman, who is expected to lose to Brad Lander. One interesting thing I noticed was that Randi Weingarten's rabbi wife is backing Lander. Hmmm.
I never liked Espaillat and am glad he is being challenged but my instinct is he will win and the Mamdani push in that area may be an error. And his candidate against Reynoso who is backed by Nydia Velazquez is also tricky but I think Mamdani will win that one in the Commie corridor but his relationship with the more conservative- leaning Hispanic community will be harmed long-term.
I think the UFT is backing Alex Bores - Mamdani voted in that district but is keeping his vote secret. I'm betting he voted for Nina Schwalbe,
She has no chance and I might have voted for her too but I hate Micah Lasher for too many reasons to cite here and would go for Bores in a rare agreement with the UFT.
I voted already for one candidate for the state assembly seat being vacated by the current holder who inherited the seat from her mom who still has a Queens county political job. Good riddance. The Dem machine is pushing its candidate which is more of the same, while I'm backing Mike Scala who has run before when I backed a more left Dem Soc candidate but Mike has moved a bit left and I've met him and contributed. Reality bite - the machine will win and then face a serious MAGA challenge. Remember, corp Dem supreme Greg Meeks is the local congressman - and it is here where I expect a serious challenge from the Dem Soc left to come in two years, possibly from a great candidate, Assemblyman Khaleel Anderson, a major Mamdani supporter who I canvassed with. His was the only district in Rockaway that went for Mamdani.
Tonight will hold fascinating post-mortems. Sam Seder, my fave podcaster, dwelled deeply into the DSA move to reshape the Dem party and I tend to back any challenge to the corp wing which would also weaken the UFT leadership ties to that wing.
June 23, 2026
June 16 was the final meeting of the year of the UFT Retired Teacher Chapter and I started writing this piece that day.
This is only the second blog I've done this month when in the past I used to do 3 a day.
I had medical stuff going on the morning of the 16th with chemo at MSK and as usual
had a great nurse who is from Memphis but moved to NYC in January and
just loves it here. And she lives in Murray Hill nearby my apartment.
She noticed my Knick shirt and said she is a convert from a Grizzly fan.
That's the spirit. My Knicks shirt was getting lots of thumbs up.
Leaflets announcing the Fix Retiree Benefits June 28 Zoom were being
handed out. I think a few hundred have registered already.
Fix Retiree Benefits consists of retirees that have felt they had no
real voice in the world of Retiree Advocate, the group that
fundamentally runs the RTC chapter.
I'm impatient to get things done and I feel a campaign against Unity
for the RTC needs to get organized sooner rather than later. I'll get
more into the rationale behind FRB next time. At least 4 RTC Ex Bd members are working with Fix Retiree Benefits with others echoing silent support. Most of the others are elected delegates.
Bennett Fischer had already started his CL report, so I missed the beginning because I was getting eats.
The Not GOOD:
Overall, I saw a pattern repeated -- New Motions have been moved to the end of the meeting and since that was done, meetings have been adjourned before any New Motions can be gotten too. It is true that Unity had been using this time to make mom and apple pie resos and this was a ploy to shut that down, but is also precludes internal people from making new motions which I have been known to do on a whim and which seems to bother the RTC leadership.
I can remember being livid at Randi at one meeting for shutting down new motions and she called me into the hallway to apologize and I told her, "even Shanker never did that." People in charge, whether Unity at the DA or RA at the RTC meetings seem to fear the unknown new motion and look to control that space, which is not democratic.
A lesson about the RA/RTC leadership - once you get into power, any criticism is very bothersome and the tendency to put up roadblocks is hard to resist. Not new boss same as old boss but a warning sign.
Bennett has his critics on how he runs the meetings. At times he seems confused. Someone I know who taught at his school when he was CL finds it hard to believe as he was a very effective CL, but dealing with meetings like these are way different than chapter meetings.
I can only think of how Tom Murphy (or Tom Pappas before him) ran meetings when Unity was in control see things as relative.
Right now give me a choice of Bennett and anyone in Unity and I take Bennett.
Bennett's reports don't go on as long as Mulgrew's and he takes questions. Critics need to think about managing a meeting of 300 live and a thousand online and have a bit of rachmones. But criticism on time management are legit.
The UGLY
Mulgrew also made a report at this meeting and seemed in such good cheer and comfortable with his lies, which I will let Arthur expound on. Mulgrew also took some questions. (A few months ago Mulgrew ordered Bennett to give him time at our meeting and the RTC EB were outraged as Mulgrew took time from our business. I was one of the crazies who said we should ban Mulgrew from meetings or turn our backs but I guess I don't live in the real world.)
We had committee reports and Good and Welfare where anyone
can say what they want and we were beyond 2:30, before we got to the
regular order of business, with a 3PM automatic adjournment.
The GOOD:
Bennett Fischer's report was the strongest in two years challenging the UFT leadership over
various issue and he received good grades even from critics because
there had been a feeling he was being too light on the leadership in the
past.
NOTE: RA is dominated by members of New Action, which had a 12-year deal with Unity. Bennett was never part of New Action and does not have that type of mentality but he has worked at the UFT in the past and does have certain relationships with leadership, not necessarily a bad thing but also not always a good thing.
Some people are very angry at Bennett but even they praised his approach. I think Bennett senses the critics and his comments were strong. No
matter our differences so far, I am not one of the people who feel he
should be replaced, at least if we manage to put a common slate
together, though the winds blowing from the RA direction are not a good
sign. Bennett can play a role in bringing everyone together but is he so
deep in the RA machine he can't escape?
RTC EB Elects 11 replacement delegates, rejected by UFT membership
I was glad Bennett raised this point in a strong manner.
Arthur reports:
Bennett mentions RTC delegate
election. Following process in RTC constitution, UFT bosses chose not to
seat delegates. Bennett says Carl Cambria explained decision to him.
Appealed decision to UFT Exec Board.
David Pecoraro to Mulgrew—Our CL
spoke of Exec Board meeting holding election in accordance with article 8
of UFT and RTC constitution. Will you uphold ruling of Weingarten that
this procedure followed previously can go forth. No taxation without
representation.
Mulgrew—Since I just found out about this, will
go to exec board and check. What’s in rules? If rules are there, I will
make my voice heard at exec board. Didn’t know there was an issue. If
rules are followed…
What a load of horseshit
that Mulgrew just found out about this - a reminder of how Trump fakes
things. Mulgrew has his finger in every pot. I'm glad Dave Pecoraro, who was thrown out of Unity years ago, put him on the spot.
I know it would have been impolite if Bennett expressed this thought, but someone should have over this blatant lie.
I had been
hectoring Bennett for well over a year to raise the issue of replacing
delegates who had resigned or passed away so we could get our full
complement of 300. Recently we went through the two month process and
elected 11 delegates, including the recently retired Amy Arundell (I bet the leadership would not be happy to see Amy at the DA). The
RTC constitution says the RTC Ex Bd can replace elected officials and we
had already replaced an officer and a few Ex Bd but the membership dept
ruled that we had no right to replace delegates and pointed out how
school chapters hold an election to replace delegates. Now being
consistent, if the EB can't do it then there must be an election in the
70k member chapter, a nightmare of sorts to mail out ballots - unless
they did it by electronic voting, which was recently rejected by a
special committee, including the ARISE reps, siding with Unity. Allowing the elected EB to do it would save enormous
time and money but Unity doesn't want us to replace delegates and so we will never see an election. Look for the RTC leadership to drop the issue after their appeal to the UFT Ex Bd is rejected.
The Semi-BAD from Arthur
Bennett announces all meetings will be Tuesday.
Evidently the decision to vary times has not resulted in increased
attendance. He has not consulted the Exec. Board about this, which makes
me wonder exactly who made the decision. Nor were we consulted about
the changing times this year.
I can live with not being involved in deciding meeting dates though the survey might have benefited from a wider input, but the RTC powers that be may be increasingly resistant to voices outside the Retiree Advocate circle.
Bennett
and his advisors have made unilateral decisions that leave the RTC Exec Bd out, a dangerous trend toward lack of transparency that might
explain the rise of critics.
The RTC constitution states that any member may
attend an EB meeting but they are never announced. Even when we had
openings on the EB, only insiders knew about them.
The GOOD and BAD from Arthur:
Bennett announces a survey. Ironically, after the decision was
made, our input is desired.
I started paying attention as Bennett put up a QR code for those in the room to take the survey. What of the people at home? They tell the people at home to go to a web site. This survey needs to be sent out to all RTC members though the CL email, but will the UFT hierarchy allow it? I finally get a look at the survey in detail a few days later.
There are a bunch of questions on attendance at meetings. It seems the results might have informed a decision on when meetings should be held.
The UGLY: The RA Pizzitola Purge Continues
There is a question on survey about the speakers and programs at RTC meetings. Since Marianne Pizzitola was our very first speaker at our first meeting in Oct. 2025, I looked for her name.
Her name was not there.
Is this an oops, or intentional? Go to Kalshi and bet. A major sticking point between FRB and RA is Marianne, as RA tries to forget it was her backing that played a major role in our victory two years ago and is pissed she backed ABC in the UFT election helping lead ABC to a 3-1 margin over ARISE.
Ideas and comments you would like to share with the RTC Leadership Team, Additional questions for the Retired Teachers Chapter Leadership Team.
My questions would be exactly who constitutes the RTC Leadership Team? One would expect the officers and Exec Bd but Arthur is an officer and none of the 15 member EB I have been in touch with knew about the survey before it was released at the RTC meeting.
The GOOD:
At the June 2 RTC EB meeting Bennett brought a reso calling for retirees to
vote in TRS elections and I suggested he add that retirees can also run
in TRS elections and this reso was the sole item on the regular order of business. Also note that RA, NAC and MORE - the ARISE coalition, sat out the TRS election, which helped Unity. Just sayin'.
Unity hack Peter Goodman kills reso on retirees running in UFT elections with nefarious intentions
Arthur: The UGLY
Today we managed to table not one, but two resolutions. One
resolved to allow retirees to vote on trustees. A Unity member objected.
Unity is very happy with TRS elections, and doesn’t want us uppity
retirees to have a voice. We don’t, in fact, need a constitutional
convention to change this. For example, we passed an equal rights amendment to the NY State Constitution back in 2024, without affecting pensions.
The objection was utter nonsense, another page in Unity’s perpetual quest to make sure we get nothing done.
Unity’s Peter Goodman whipped out an appeal to fear, making the outlandish assertion that if we were to seek the right for retirees to vote in trustee elections, it would entail opening up the NY State Constitution, and possibly tampering with our pensions.
I voted no to tabling, but Goodman stoked enough fear to stop the resolution. Trustees are elected to work for city, not state pensions. I didn’t think of that at the time, but I knew that even if it were statewide, parts the constitution are changed via voting, like our Equal Rights Amendment.
Vote on motion to table—Y 778 n 90 y 145 n 48 87%
That the tabling reso won overwhelmingly, as Unity initiatives have increasingly been winning this year, is a clear sign of Unity increasingly gaining support in their plan to retake the chapter in next year's election, with no real response from the RTC leadership, one more good reason for everyone to get together to keep Unity from retaking the chapter and giving Mulgrew free reign to savage our healthcare.
The fact is - and I would have pointed this out if the meeting had not run out of time - is that with the RTC still up for grabs next year with what looks like a 50-50 split, allowing retirees to vote in TRS elections would threaten Unity control of the 3 TRS reps and Goodman was using scare tactics to stop this reso, which won't come up again until our next meeting in October.
After the meeting ended I went across the street for coffee with a few Fix Retirement Benefits colleagues to hash what happened over.
----
A few more Arthur tidbits:
Whopper of the Day—Michael Mulgrew opposes union division. This is a man who said, in my presence, that those who questioned him spouted “fairy tales,” and “make everything a conspiracy.” We can’t “handle the facts.”
Mulgrew
then told us he appreciates people coming here, and loves when they’re
here. (Doubtless that’s why he provides us with only ten minutes to
share during the meeting.) There’s always a but, though. I often recall a
Shakespeare teacher I had in college who told us, “Whenever anyone says
but, you may disregard whatever precedes it.” And here comes the
important part:
Mulgrew then said if we didn’t agree, and
attacked “each other,” we were just as guilty as the people who attack
us from the outside. He repeatedly compared those of us who disagreed
with him to our enemies. Who am I? Am I Eva Moskowitz? Michael
Bloomberg?
LeRoy Barr followed this up by urging people to “shun” dissenting voices. All due respect, this man has a lot of gall to lecture us on our behavior.
Sometimes, like today, he politely tells us to sit down and shut up. Other times, he is not so careful.
Mulgrew also said the worst thing would be to pit retirees against in-service members. This was also curious. Mulgrew himself told in service members
if we did not vote to change 12-126 to enable charges for Medicare, we
would have to pay $1500 premiums. If that isn’t pitting in-service
against retirees, I don’t know what is.
Mulgrew also said
we should “shut newspaper reporters up,” and referred to the
Unity-dominated Delegate Assembly as the “silent majority.”
Shades
of Trump and Nixon. Our union leader, who arbitrarily and capriciously
fires any UFT employee who dares question him, ought not to be lecturing
us on decorum.
Sean Ahern—Moves RTC hold a debate with reps from both sides on NYHA and 1096. Major issues.
B—Haven’t
we had conferences for this? Motion is to have a debate with people on
both sides of issues, You can’t vote for me to do something. Not saying I
wouldn’t but out of order that I host.
Point ot info—Carmen
Alvarez—Don’t believe this is in order. Not clear what it wants to do.
Structure for resolution not met. Table until something is clearer.
Busy days here at Ed Notes central. I was at the RTC Exec Bd meeting on Tuesday and following the TRS election and also talking to people in the UFT about the Mulgrew assault on competence to insure personal loyalty in the union, along with firings and threats of any hint of independent voices.
I'm back on chemo and had my second treatment yesterday - I'm on an every 2 week schedule. I even took my computer and worked on this item while I was there for a few hours and walking back to my apartment passed a street fair on E. 46 and look what I found:
I came back to Rockaway in the afternoon and want to get this out so I can go outside and do some yard work. The steroids are still working and I'm hoping to have energy to video The Crucible at Rockaway Theatre Company tonight. I saw part of it the other night.
TRS Election
I've seen preliminary results of the TRS election but DOE has to release final totals. I can say Tom Brown won, David Kazansky finished second, showing some organizing muscle. Analyzing the results will be a fun thing to do and I have a lot more to report after talking to many people. The legacy caucuses in the ARISE coalition mostly sat out the election, except for some individuals.
Unity/ARISE Reps Reject electronic voting
As for electronic voting, the bogus committee formed when I, as a member of the election committee in 2025, called for electronic voting, was turned down in exchange for a bogus committee, which I declared bullshit early on, predicting they would find ways to reject electronic voting, which is exactly what happened. The surprise was the two ARISE reps voting with Unity. The ABC reps put out a must read report that tears apart every Unity argument.
...many of the challenges associated with current methods, lost ballots,
outdated addresses, inconsistent administration, chain-of-custody
concerns, are exactly the kinds of problems modern electronic systems
are designed to reduce. Secure platforms can incorporate verification,
encryption, audit logs, and protections against duplicate voting in ways
that strengthen accountability and transparency. But we didn’t
seriously examine whether those tools could improve the process.
Instead, the ARISE/Unity majority recommendation assumes that older
methods are more reliable simply because they are more familiar.
BTW, Unity had 10 members, ARISE 2 and ABC 3. You know, fair.
Unity is now bragging they led the way on electronic voting - by saying no -- and by the way were joined in saying now by reps from the ARISE group - MORE and New Action/RA. These groups had supported our initiatives in 2022 and 2025.
I
pushed hard for an electronic voting option but naturally there are
loads of roadblocks. This time they came up with the constitution
wrinkle - some language in the constitution that says you have to use
written ballots. Christina Gavin pointed out that written can also mean
electronic.
Anyway,
I pointed out the low vote totals for previous elections and handed out
the ugly story on a chart. Like less than 20% of actives voted while
40% of retirees votes. After all the reasons we couldn't do electronic
voting were pointed out I said I had raised this same reso 3 years ago
and they promised to look into the issue but did nothing so we are back
to ground zero.
I
also pointed out that in previous elections the leadership could count
on the retiree vote to carry them through, now with that vote in
potential jeopardy, the leadership should want very much to increase
in-service vote for their own protection. But don't expect any creative
ideas to come from the moribund leadership. They looked like turtles
turned on their backs.
The
best they could come up with was Queens District Rep James Vasquez with
a reso to form a task force to "study" the issue. He also placed blame
on the oppo people over the past 3 years for not bringing up the issue
during that time. Duhhhh, James -- we know you guys never want
electronic voting and you will forget all about your task force.
But Vasquez did not lose the opportunity to put out a dumb blog post attacking the
opposition and blaming them for his own party's failures. That attack
can be termed, "I'm scared shit we will lose and I will have to go back
to the classroom and teach a full load instead of my one or two periods a
day - and lose my second pension."
Sure, Unity led the way on electronic voting -- right over the cliff.
Arthur reported on the process as reported on ABC:
They met only three times
and closed the book on facing the issue. They didn’t bother to study the
processes of other unions that used electronic voting successfully, let
alone why so few of us vote. This looks like nothing more than a setup
with a clear, predetermined outcome. Apathy is Unity’s best friend, and
they won’t risk giving the 72% of members who don’t vote a voice.
Instead,
Unity bosses will enable live voting only in Unity strongholds, where
their paid patronage cult members can tacitly remind folks where and how
to vote. Most disappointing is that the two ARISE
members on the committee, MORE’s Olivia Swisher and Retiree Advocate’s
Michael Shulman, voted with Unity. Shulman is also a leader of New
Action, which has been pushing electronic voting for a decade or more.
What happened? You’d have to ask him.
Only ABC members Chad Hamilton, Daniel Alicea and Katie Anskat voted no on Unity’s restrictive voting plan.
RTC Exec Bd Meeting
Yesterday I attended the RTC Exec Bd meeting. There are 25 people on the RTC EB and that includes the 10 officers. There are no Unity reps because RTC elections are winner take all - 25 EB and 300 delegates. Retiree Advocate, now an official caucus with $50 dues structure and a 15 member steering or organizing committee won that election in an alliance with Marianne Pizzitola. It was a great partnership. Shutting off the former 300 Unity delegates who gave Unity absolute dominance of the DA was a major outcome. Over the past year and a half that alliance has frayed which has made Unity bold with hope they can retake the chapter in next year's election.
RTC replaces delegates as per its constitution
Bennett Fischer, RTC CL:
The results are in from the RTC executive board vote to fill RTC
delegate vacancies. There were 21 people running for 11 spots. The 11
winners are: Renee C. Airhuoyo, Jocelyn Brathwaite, Michael Broucum,
Laura Calamuci, Chris Griffin, Peter Matsoukas,
Sonia Silva, Carolyn Tacey, Linda Weissman, Hazel Fershleiser, and Amy
Arundell. We will submit your names to the union for certification.
And
therein lies a story. RA recruited 300 delegates to run with us two
years ago and we wiped out Unity. I recruited about 30 people to run
with us, including a former colleague who doesn't live in NYC.
Unfortunately he came down with stage 4 pancreatic cancer and died in
March 2025 but we know in October 2024 he wasn't interested in the DA
and I notified people we needed to replace him, along with a few others I
recruited who wanted to drop out and only ran as a favor to me because
they never thought they would win.
Apparently some people at the
UFT were telling Bennett we did not have the right to replace delegates
even though former Unity delegates told us former RTC leader Tom Murphy
just did it when there was a vacancy without even bothering to follow
the RTC constitution which explicitly says the RTC Ex Bd nominates and
votes on replacing elected positions.
Only in the last few
months has the RTC leadership gotten more aggressive on this issue. Not always
transparent (the constitution says any RTC member may attend Ex Bd
meetings but Bennett never announces that or sends out a link other than
those who are aware), this time Bennett made an announcement at the RTC
meeting and there were 21 candidates, including a few from Unity, one
of whom I actually voted for, though I had nominated LeRoy Barr who told
me if I did he'd buy me a drink but he declined the nomination - but
still owes me a drink.
Note that Amy Arundell did squeak into the final position (there was
rank choice voting, indicating a level of hostility to her from the many
ARISE connected RTC EB members. She should have been a slam dunk but the level of mistrust still reigns almost a year after the UFT election. In my opinion, the only way the Mulgrew administration continues to survive is due to this mistrust. Witness the story above about how ARISE voted with Unity. If Mulgrew was smart like Randi (which he isn't) he'd offer to work out a joint slate with ARISE in the next election. After all two of the 3 caucuses had a 12 year arrangement with Randi. (And by the way, Mulgrew broke that arrangement that helped Unity keep control of the high schools within 5 years of taking over --- see my recent blog on the level of incompetency - Mulgrewism is the UFT Version of Trumpism MAGA.
Bennett was not 100% this would be a slam dunk. Imagine if Unity refused to seat our democratically elected delegates, like the Mississippi delegation at the 1968 Democratic convention. I know the RTC leadership doesn't have the guts, but if we can get at least 50-100 people there to demand our delegates get seated and then walk out en masse if they don't. Good luck with that. And I say that in reference to the following item.
Arthur had a reso calling for us not to have to pay $180 a month for a prescription drug plan that included a petition some of us have been circulating that already has 6k signatures.
The RTC Exec Bd supported the reso but there was push back on the petition, which has ties to ABC and you could sense the hostility from some of the leading lights with questions like "who is this going to?" and concerns over how the petition would be used.
I'll let Arthur tell you about it.
RTC Chapter Leader Bennett Fischer moved my
resolution, demanding the UFT pay for our prescription premiums, up to
number one on our agenda. I was pretty happy about that, and I’ve posted
it below. It’s a mixed victory though, as the RA folks all voted to
drop the second resolved, decoupling it from our online petition that’s
already garnered over six thousand signatures.
This is a botched opportunity to build on a solid foundation and reach further.
It’s outlandish to leave six thousand signatures on the table.
Retiree
Advocate is repeating an error they made early on. When we were first
elected, they willingly surrendered the official UFT Retiree page, which
had 6,000 followers, to a Unity Patronage Cult Member. After two years,
they haven’t managed to recruit half that number. In failing to link to our petition, they toss away 6,000 signatures we’ve collected.
ABC is all about organizing. In September, we will take that petition into school buildings and build on it. No one in service wants to pay these exorbitant premiums. Members will read it and say oh HELL no.
It
will be good to pass the resolution, but the RTC action that comes
along with it, I’m afraid, could be as lackluster as that for 1096.
There
were several rationales offered. Bennett said when he first saw it he
thought it may have been created by teenagers who wanted to make
trouble. It wasn’t my turn to speak. I really wanted to say I’m not a
teenager, but yes I want to make trouble. Making trouble, you know, is how you get stuff done.
If you don’t believe me, ask Marianne Pizzitola, without whom we’d all have an inferior Medicare “Advantage” plan right now.
Several
people asked who wrote the petition. I kept raising my hand to show I
did, and it took a while before people understood.
Another
objection was you can’t put a “hot link” on a resolution. Several
people seemed to agree, but I was not among them. Better to start with
6,000 than zero. What could they be thinking?
RTC has not been great with petitions.
When I tried to have them start a petition in support of 1096, the RTC
Executive Board voted to “table” the suggestion. That’s a polite way of
saying we are doing nothing, and indeed, aside from one strongly worded letter, mostly written by me, we have done nothing.
The comment about not putting links in a reso drove me wild because the link is an organizing tool and their mentality seems to be to lobby at the top - send strongly worded letters to Mulgrew - and not organize at the bottom. A reso that goes nowhere seems to satisfy them while many of us think a reso without an action component is a form of pounding your chest.
End Winner Take All - Install a Proportional rep
Back in the 70s when we raised proportional representation as an alt to winner take all, Unity hacks (and Shanker) would say that's how Hitler came to power. Allowing space for a variety of viewpoints and giving people a voice leads directly to Hitler. Sure. Proportional representation is a version of the parliamentary system. If there are a 100 positions you portion them out to each group running based on their percentage. It's not all that simple but worth exploring. We all say when we run for UFT elections that if we were in power we would democratize the union but as we've seen with RTC, once you smell the roses of power, changing things to share with a group like Unity takes some of that nice smell away.
As oppo people we always opposed the winner take all approach and when we were winning 30% of the vote we felt we should one third of the delegates, the officers and the exec bd. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, we are in the drivers seat and it makes meetings like we just had easier without Unity attempts to undermine any initiative that counters the Mulgrew line. Unity people are free to attend the monthly RTC meetings and they have boldly tried to undermine any hint of variance from Unity orthodoxy. To distract the chapter from issues like protecting our healthcare or eliminating co-pays or relieving us of the over-expensive prescription drug plan they bring up resos on fair housing or protecting social security -- duhhhhh! Like just passing their reso will accomplish something.
Bennett has been fairly tolerant to Unity, even bending over backward to be fair and not act like Tom Murphy did. That extends to criticizing those of us who go on the attack against Unity playing games (Kumbaya - we are all union members). After all, the Unity goal is to get us out of office and go back to their own dictatorial running of the chapter. The Unity crew had asked to have their fair housing reso put on the main agenda so they wouldn't have to try for the new motion period -- oh how beautiful to see them whining while Mulgrew does the same thing to the oppo by filling the new motion period with mom and apple pie resos from the leadership. RTC EB discussed it, with Bennett and a few other voting to put their reso on the agenda but there were objections from people who wanted to amend their motion, with the result that they decided to write their own version and we did and voted to put that one on the main agenda.
This seemed to outrage the Unity crowd. Like how dare we act like Mulgrew? To add insult, I spoke at the May RTC meeting and added a little wrinkle that I knew would enrage them further. To make housing more affordable, my amendment called for abolishing co-pays. Now you'd think I'd tossed a stink bomb. They demanded to have a speaker opposed after the question was called and Bennett didn't recognize them - which I felt was a mistake - let Unity make the case for co-pays (I say this as I am getting chemo and will be billed for a co-pay.)
Our platform called for some system of proportional rep - ending winner take all - and we have a constitution we can amend - and I'm sure the UFT leadership would put obstacles in the way since they expect to take back the chapter in next year's election. I should point out that in the 2021 election we asked the Unity people to give us 5 out of the 300 delegates so our 30% voters get some representation. They said NO. But I'm more generous. At the vote count in June 2024 when I watched the Unity people look crushed, I told one of their leaders if they had prop rep their 37% they would have gotten over 100 delegates. He gave me a sour look.
Since we won I have pushed our new RTC leadership - of which I am one (sort of) - to change the constitution to allow for prop rep but it didn't seem to be a priority - some seem to think they will win again next year. I think we are in a 50/50 split with Unity at this point - as long as we have Marianne with us, and given the RA crowd hostility to her, that is not a sure bet.
Bennett did mention taking a look at this as a project for next year. With it being an election year and so much going on, it is unlikely that the process would be complete by the time the election takes place, especially since Unity would try to stop it - unless all retirees get together and remake the alliance with Marianne Pizzitola, at which point Unity might see they might lose and take a half loaf.
A bill moving rapidly through the New York Legislature—Senate Bill
S.9577-A, sponsored by Senator Jessica Ramos, and Assembly Bill
A.10835-A, sponsored by Assemblymember Judy Griffin—is being promoted as
a measure to stop fraudulent communications that falsely claim to
represent labor unions and their representatives.
In
recent years, disputes have emerged involving UFTMembers.org, an
independent publication critical of UFT union leadership. Other
controversies have involved parody, satire, and internal political
disputes within labor organizations. Reform caucuses and member advocacy
groups routinely use union names to identify the members they
represent. Independent newsletters, blogs, podcasts, and election
campaigns frequently discuss union leadership, governance, elections,
and policy decisions.
Those activities are not fraud.
They are part of union democracy.
Yet the legislation currently
contains no explicit protections making clear that criticism, reform
advocacy, parody, election-related communications, and internal
organizing remain protected.
Read URGENT CALL and sign petition to amend the law.
This bill smells to me - Unity etc and other union leadership are trying to brand internal critics as outside agitators, the classic manner of dictatorships. Remember how civil rights workers were branded as outside agitators. Our crew behind this amendment has had great outreach to explain it all.
Here is a link to Arthur's report of the RTC Ex Bd meeting and his petition.
UFT Welfare Fund Should Pay for Retiree Prescription Premiums
Whereas, UFT retirees are on fixed incomes, and,
Whereas, $180 per month is a high premium, and,
Whereas, many UFT retirees pay for other family members as well, and
Whereas, this rate went up a whopping 50% over a two-year period, and,
Whereas, this is a hardship on many UFT retirees, and
Whereas, other union Welfare Funds, including those of FDNY, NYPD and DC37 cover prescription premium costs for members, and
Whereas, UFT officers frequently mention “premium-free health insurance,” and,
Whereas, UFT officers speak of our Welfare Fund as the best in the country, be it therefore,
Resolved, that our Welfare Fund must cover retirees just as other Welfare Funds do, and be it further,
Resolved,
that we actively support and encourage signing of the petition at
https://stopchargingretirees.org/ demanding UFT Welfare Fund cover the
costs of pharmacy insurance premiums for retired members.
At
the suggestion of RTC Exec. Board member Alan Stein, who pointed out
members get $900 back, I proposed the following addition:
Whereas this costs members a net $2160 a year, or members with spouses 4320 a year,
