Rob Cordasco, CPA

Are you buying a business that will have one or more co-owners? Or do you already own one fitting that description? If so, consider installing a buy-sell agreement. A well-drafted agreement can do these valuable things:

• Transform your business ownership interest into a more liquid asset,
• Prevent unwanted ownership changes, and
• Avoid hassles with the IRS.

Agreement basics

There are two basic types of buy-sell agreements: Cross-purchase agreements and redemption agreements (sometimes called liquidation agreements).

A cross-purchase agreement is a contract between you and the other co-owners. Under the agreement, a withdrawing co-owner’s ownership interest must be purchased by the remaining co-owners if a triggering event, such as a death or disability, occurs.

A redemption agreement is a contract between the business entity and its co-owners (including you). Under the agreement, a withdrawing co-owner’s ownership interest must be purchased by the entity if a triggering event occurs.

Triggering events

You and the other co-owners specify the triggering events you want to include in your agreement. You’ll certainly want to include obvious events like death, disability and attainment of a stated retirement age. You can also include other events that you deem appropriate, such as divorce.

Valuation and payment terms

Make sure your buy-sell agreement stipulates an acceptable method for valuing the business ownership interests. Common valuation methods include using a fixed per-share price, an appraised fair market value figure, or a formula that sets the selling price as a multiple of earnings or cash flow.

Also ensure the agreement specifies how amounts will be paid out to withdrawing co-owners or their heirs under various triggering events.

Life insurance to fund the agreement

The death of a co-owner is perhaps the most common, and catastrophic, triggering event. You can use life insurance policies to form the financial backbone of your buy-sell agreement.

In the simplest case of a cross-purchase agreement between two co-owners, each co-owner purchases a life insurance policy on the other. If one co-owner dies, the surviving co-owner collects the insurance death benefit proceeds and uses them to buy out the deceased co-owner’s interest from the estate, surviving spouse or other heir(s). The insurance death benefit proceeds are free of any federal income tax, so long as the surviving co-owner is the original purchaser of the policy on the other co-owner.

However, a seemingly simple cross-purchase arrangement between more than two co-owners can get complicated, because each co-owner must buy life insurance policies on all the other co-owners. In this scenario, you may want to use a trust or partnership to buy and maintain one policy on each co-owner. Then, if a co-owner dies, the trust or partnership collects the death benefit proceeds tax-free and distributes the cash to the remaining co-owners. They then use the money to fund their buyout obligations under the cross-purchase agreement.

To fund a redemption buy-sell agreement, the business entity itself buys policies on the lives of all co-owners and then uses the death benefit proceeds buy out deceased co-owners.

Specify in your agreement that any buyout that isn’t funded with insurance death benefit proceeds will be paid out under a multi-year installment payment arrangement. This gives you (and any remaining co-owners) some breathing room to come up with the cash needed to fulfill your buyout obligation.

Create certainty for heirs

If you’re like many business co-owners, the value of your share of the business comprises a big percentage of your estate. Having a buy-sell agreement ensures that your ownership interest can be sold by your heir(s) under terms that you approved when you set it up. Also, the price set by a properly drafted agreement establishes the value of your ownership interest for federal estate tax purposes, thus avoiding possible IRS hassles.

As a co-owner of a valuable business, having a well-drafted buy-sell agreement in place is pretty much a no-brainer. It provides financial protection to you and your heir(s) as well as to your co-owners and their heirs. The agreement also avoids hassles with the IRS over estate taxes.

Buy-sell agreements aren’t DIY projects. Contact us about setting one up.

© 2024

      

Federal estimated tax payments are designed to ensure that certain individuals pay their fair share of taxes throughout the year. If you don’t have enough federal tax withheld from your paychecks and other payments, you may have to make estimated tax payments. This is the case if you receive interest, dividends, self-employment income, capital gains, a pension or other income that’s not covered by withholding.

Individuals must pay 25% of a “required annual payment” by April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15 of the following year, to avoid an underpayment penalty. If one of those dates falls on a weekend or holiday, the payment is due on the next business day.

So the third installment for 2024 is due on Monday, September 16 because the 15th falls on a Sunday. Payments are made using Form 1040-ES.

The amount due

The required annual payment for most individuals is the lower of 90% of the tax shown on the current year’s return or 100% of the tax shown on the return for the previous year. However, if the adjusted gross income on your previous year’s return was more than $150,000 ($75,000 if you’re married filing separately), you must pay the lower of 90% of the tax shown on the current year’s return or 110% of the tax shown on the return for the previous year.

Most people who receive the bulk of their income in the form of wages satisfy these payment requirements through the tax withheld by their employers from their paychecks. Those who make estimated tax payments generally do so in four installments. After determining the required annual payment, divide that number by four and make four equal payments by the due dates.

But you may be able to use the annualized income method to make smaller payments. This method is useful to people whose income flow isn’t uniform over the year, perhaps because of a seasonal business. For example, if your income comes exclusively from a business operated in a resort area during June, July, and August, no estimated payment is required before September 15.

The underpayment penalty

If you don’t make the required payments, you may be subject to an underpayment penalty. The penalty equals the product of the interest rate charged by the IRS on deficiencies, times the amount of the underpayment for the period of the underpayment.

However, the underpayment penalty doesn’t apply to you if:

• The total tax shown on your return is less than $1,000 after subtracting withholding tax paid;
• You had no tax liability for the preceding year, you were a U.S. citizen or resident for that entire year, and that year was 12 months;
• For the fourth (January 15) installment, you file your return by that January 31 and pay your tax in full; or
• You’re a farmer or fisherman and pay your entire estimated tax by January 15, or pay your entire estimated tax and file your tax return by March 1.

In addition, the IRS may waive the penalty if the failure was due to casualty, disaster or other unusual circumstances and it would be inequitable to impose the penalty. The penalty can also be waived for reasonable cause during the first two years after you retire (and reach age 62) or become disabled.

We can help

Contact us if you need help figuring out your estimated tax payments or you have other questions about how the rules apply to you.

© 2024

      

If you own a closely held corporation, you can borrow funds from your business at rates that are lower than those charged by a bank. But it’s important to avoid certain risks and charge an adequate interest rate.

Basics of this strategy

Interest rates have increased over the last couple years. As a result, shareholders may decide to take loans from their corporations rather than pay higher interest rates on bank loans. In general, the IRS expects closely held corporations to charge interest on related-party loans, including loans to shareholders, at rates that at least equal applicable federal rates (AFRs). Otherwise, adverse tax results can be triggered. Fortunately, the AFRs are lower than the rates charged by commercial lenders.

It can be advantageous to borrow money from your closely held corporation to pay personal expenses. These expenses may include your child’s college tuition, home improvements, a new car or high-interest credit card debt. But avoid these two key risks:

1. Not creating a legitimate loan. When borrowing money from your corporation, it’s important to establish a bona fide borrower-lender relationship. Otherwise, the IRS could reclassify the loan proceeds as additional compensation. This reclassification would result in an income tax bill for you and payroll tax for you and your corporation. (However, the business would be allowed to deduct the amount treated as compensation and the corporation’s share of related payroll taxes.)

Alternatively, the IRS might claim that you received a taxable dividend if your company is a C corporation. That would trigger taxable income for you with no offsetting deduction for your business.

Draft a formal written loan agreement that establishes your unconditional promise to repay the corporation a fixed amount under an installment repayment schedule or on demand by the corporation. Take other steps such as documenting the terms of the loan in your corporate minutes.

2. Not charging adequate interest. The minimum interest rate your business should charge to avoid triggering the complicated and generally unfavorable “below-market loan rules” is the IRS-approved AFR. (There’s an exception to the below-market loan rules if the aggregate loans from a corporation to a shareholder are $10,000 or less.)

Current AFRs

The IRS publishes AFRs monthly based on market conditions. For loans made in July 2024, the AFRs are:

• 4.95% for short-term loans of up to three years,
• 4.40% for mid-term loans of more than three years but not more than nine years, and
• 4.52% for long-term loans of over nine years.

These annual rates assume monthly compounding of interest. The AFR that applies to a loan depends on whether it’s a demand or term loan. The distinction is important. A demand loan is payable in full at any time upon notice and demand by the corporation. A term loan is any borrowing arrangement that isn’t a demand loan. The AFR for a term loan depends on the term of the loan, and the same rate applies for the entire term.

An example

Suppose you borrow $100,000 from your corporation with the principal to be repaid in installments over 10 years. This is a term loan of over nine years, so the AFR in July would be 4.52% compounded monthly for 10 years. The corporation must report the loan interest as taxable income.

On the other hand, if the loan document gives your corporation the right to demand full repayment at any time, it’s a demand loan. Then, the AFR is based on a blended average of monthly short-term AFRs for the year. If rates go up, you must pay more interest to stay clear of the below-market loan rules. If rates go down, you’ll pay a lower interest rate.

Term loans for more than nine years are smarter from a tax perspective than short-term or demand loans because they lock in current AFRs. If rates drop, a high-rate term loan can be repaid early and your corporation can enter into a new loan agreement at the lower rate.

Avoid adverse consequences

Shareholder loans can be complicated, especially if the loan charges interest below the AFR, the shareholder stops making payments or the corporation has more than one shareholder. Contact us about how to proceed in your situation.

© 2024

      

Get ready: The upcoming presidential and congressional elections may significantly alter the tax landscape for businesses in the United States. The reason has to do with a tax law that’s scheduled to expire in about 17 months and how politicians in Washington would like to handle it.

How we got here

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which generally took effect in 2018, made extensive changes to small business taxes. Many of its provisions are set to expire on December 31, 2025.

As we get closer to the law sunsetting, you may be concerned about the future federal tax bill of your business. The impact isn’t clear because the Democrats and Republicans have different views about how to approach the various provisions in the TCJA.

Corporate and pass-through business rates

The TCJA cut the maximum corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. It also lowered rates for individual taxpayers involved in noncorporate pass-through entities, including S corporations and partnerships, as well as from sole proprietorships. The highest rate today is 37%, down from 39.6% before the TCJA became effective.

But while the individual rate cuts expire in 2025, the law made the corporate tax cut “permanent.” (In other words, there’s no scheduled expiration date. However, tax legislation could still raise or lower the corporate tax rate.)

In addition to lowering rates, the TCJA affects tax law in many other ways. For small business owners, one of the most significant changes is the potential expiration of the Section 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction. This is the write-off for up to 20% of QBI from noncorporate entities.

Another of the expiring TCJA business provisions is the gradual phaseout of first-year bonus depreciation. Under the TCJA,100% bonus depreciation was available for qualified new and used property that was placed in service in calendar year 2022. It was reduced to 80% in 2023, 60% in 2024, 40% in 2025, 20% in 2026 and 0% in 2027.

Potential Outcomes

The outcome of the presidential election in three months, as well as the balance of power in Congress, will determine the TCJA’s future. Here are four potential outcomes:

1. All of the TCJA provisions scheduled to expire will actually expire at the end of 2025.
2. All of the TCJA provisions scheduled to expire will be extended past 2025 (or made permanent).
3. Some TCJA provisions will be allowed to expire, while others will be extended (or made permanent).
4. Some or all of the temporary TCJA provisions will expire — and new laws will be enacted that provide different tax breaks and/or different tax rates.

How your tax bill will be affected in 2026 will partially depend on which one of these outcomes actually happens and whether your tax bill went down or up when the TCJA became effective years ago. That was based on a number of factors including your business income, your filing status, where you live (the SALT limitation negatively affects taxpayers in certain states), and whether you have children or other dependents.

Your tax situation will also be affected by who wins the presidential election and who controls Congress because Democrats and Republicans have competing visions about how to proceed. Keep in mind that tax proposals can become law only if tax legislation passes both houses of Congress and is signed by the President (or there are enough votes in Congress to override a presidential veto).

Look to the future

As the TCJA provisions get closer to expiring, and the election gets settled, it’s important to know what might change and what tax-wise moves you can make if the law does change. We can answer any questions you have and you can count on us to keep you informed about the latest news.

© 2024

      

The IRS has published new regulations relevant to taxpayers subject to the “10-year rule” for required minimum distributions (RMDs) from inherited IRAs or other defined contribution plans. The final regs, which take effect in 2025, require many beneficiaries to take annual RMDs in the 10 years following the deceased’s death.

SECURE Act ended stretch IRAs

The genesis of the new regs dates back to the 2019 enactment of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act. One of the many changes in that tax law was the elimination of so-called “stretch IRAs.”

Previously, all beneficiaries of inherited IRAs could stretch RMDs over their entire life expectancies. Younger heirs in particular benefited by taking smaller distributions for decades, deferring taxes while the accounts grew. These heirs also could pass on the IRAs to later generations, deferring the taxes even longer.

The SECURE Act created limitations on which heirs can stretch IRAs. These limits are intended to force beneficiaries to take distributions and expedite the collection of taxes. Specifically, for IRA owners or defined contribution plan participants who died in 2020 or later, only “eligible designated beneficiaries” (EDB) are permitted to stretch out payments over their life expectancies. The following heirs are considered eligible for this favorable treatment:

• Surviving spouses,
• Children younger than “the age of majority,”
• Individuals with disabilities,
• Chronically ill individuals, and
• Individuals who are no more than 10 years younger than the account owner.

All other heirs (known as designated beneficiaries) are required to take the entire balance of the account within 10 years of the death, regardless of whether the deceased died before, on or after the required beginning date (RBD) of his or her RMDs.

Note: In 2023, under another law, the age at which account owners must begin taking RMDs increased from 72 to 73, pushing the RBD date to April 1 of the year after the account owner turns 73. The age is slated to jump to 75 in 2033.

Proposed regs muddied the waters

In February 2022, the IRS issued proposed regs addressing the 10-year rule — and they brought some bad news for many affected heirs. The proposed regs provided that, if the deceased dies on or after the RBD, designated beneficiaries must take their taxable RMDs in years one through nine after death (based on their life expectancies), receiving the balance in the tenth year. A lump-sum distribution at the end of 10 years wouldn’t be allowed.

The IRS soon heard from confused taxpayers who had recently inherited IRAs or defined contribution plans and didn’t know when they were required to start taking RMDs. Beneficiaries could have been hit with a penalty based on the amounts that should have been distributed but weren’t. This penalty was 50% before 2023 but was lowered to 25% starting in 2023 (or 10% if a corrective distribution was made in a timely manner). The plans themselves could have been disqualified for failing to make RMDs.

As a result, the IRS issued a series of waivers on enforcement of the 10-year rule. With the release of the final regulations, the waivers will come to an end after 2024.

Final regs settle the matter

The IRS reviewed comments on the proposed regs suggesting that if the deceased began taking RMDs before death, the designated beneficiaries shouldn’t be required to continue the annual distributions as long as the remaining account balance is fully distributed within 10 years of death. The final regs instead require these beneficiaries to continue receiving annual distributions.

If the deceased hadn’t begun taking his or her RMDs, though, the 10-year rule is somewhat different. While the account has to be fully liquidated under the same timeline, no annual distributions are required. That gives beneficiaries more opportunity for tax planning.

To illustrate, let’s say that a designated beneficiary inherited an IRA in 2021 from a family member who had begun to take RMDs. Under the waivers, the beneficiary needn’t take RMDs for 2022 through 2024. The beneficiary must, however, take annual RMDs for 2025 through 2030, with the account fully distributed by the end of 2031. Had the deceased not started taking RMDs however, the beneficiary would have the flexibility to not take any distributions in 2025 through 2030. So long as the account was fully liquidated by the end of 2031, the beneficiary would be in compliance.

Additional proposed regs

The IRS released another set of proposed regs regarding other RMD-related changes made by SECURE 2.0, including the age when individuals born in 1959 must begin taking RMDs. Under the proposed regs, the “applicable age” for them would be 73 years.

They also include rules addressing:

• The purchase of an annuity with part of an employee’s defined contribution plan account,
• Distributions from designated Roth accounts,
• Corrective distributions,
• Spousal elections after a participant’s death,
• Divorce after the purchase of a qualifying longevity annuity contract, and
• Outright distributions to a trust beneficiary.

The proposed regs would take effect in 2025.

Timing matters

It’s important to realize that even though RMDs from an inherited IRA aren’t yet required, that doesn’t mean a beneficiary shouldn’t take distributions. If you’ve inherited an IRA or a defined contribution plan and are unsure of whether you should be taking RMDs, contact us. We’d be pleased to help you determine the best course of action for your tax situation.

© 2024